I'm really not sure what the logic behind giving the new 1800 set a dominant HP stat.
Not when there were many players asking for a Def/Dam setup.
Posted 07 January 2014 - 16:19
I'm really not sure what the logic behind giving the new 1800 set a dominant HP stat.
Not when there were many players asking for a Def/Dam setup.
Posted 07 January 2014 - 16:21
I wouldn't have picked Defense for the secondary stat, but it's better than HP.
Posted 07 January 2014 - 16:24
I see you went with the distribution I had suggested in the other thread. I am all for this as it has been a while since an LE set had high damage with some defense. last memorable 1 is helhearts (890) and that set was super popular when it came out.
Posted 07 January 2014 - 16:26
I see you went with the distribution I had suggested in the other thread. I am all for this as it has been a while since an LE set had high damage with some defense. last memorable 1 is helhearts (890) and that set was super popular when it came out.
Indeed, Def/Dam is sorely lacking right now. Though I do have some bad memories of the HH set.
Posted 07 January 2014 - 16:51
Damage instead of HP makes much more sense. I see NO use for a high HP set.
Posted 07 January 2014 - 16:55
I can say the same for a bunch of the other sets WHY didn't they listen to what we wanted. What came over them to put in HP sets, i think there is 4 new hp sets.....HP is ultimately useless. I think everyone wasted their time posting what they wanted to see in the new sets because i don't think they even looked at it while making the sets.
Posted 07 January 2014 - 17:00
What came over them to put in HP sets, i think there is 4 new hp sets.....HP is ultimately useless. I think everyone wasted their time posting what they wanted to see in the new sets because i don't think they even looked at it while making the sets.
The answer to your question lies in that suggestion thread. I went over it as soon as I saw the 1500 and 1800 sets.
Hint: Go to page 4.
Posted 07 January 2014 - 17:01
Posted 07 January 2014 - 17:04
It was rather disappointing to see nothing for the EoC players damage-wise... either 1500, 1650 or 1800 set with att-dam or def-dam (with bigger half in damage) would've been nice as long as it would fit in with at least some of the other high-lvl LE-damage sets...
going to vote yes obviously..
Posted 07 January 2014 - 17:23
A lot of us are just disappointed is all BG.
Posted 07 January 2014 - 17:35
Short n sweet i voted yes..
Posted 07 January 2014 - 17:44
personally after looking at my wifes new sets i like the HP on the 415 set...works well with armor sets in the range....but i agree also that MOST ranges...not all...dont need any hp sets....
Posted 07 January 2014 - 18:33
So why is there a HP stat in the game? Seems it is only usefull if you are a critter....but for players HP is useless?
Posted 07 January 2014 - 18:33
Def / Dam would be of infinite more use than HP / Dam ... actually, Dam / Def ... even better.
Edited by Pardoux, 07 January 2014 - 18:34.
Homer : Marge, don't discourage the boy. Weaseling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals .. except the weasel.
Eddie Izzard : The National Rifle Association say that guns don't kill people, people do. But I think the gun helps, you know ? I think it helps. I think just standing there going "BANG" - that's not going to kill too many people, is it ?
I don't mean to sound pessimistic, but it seems that everything I eat lately turns to poo ...
Posted 07 January 2014 - 18:35
Def / Dam would be of infinite more use than HP / Dam ... actually, Dam / Def ... even better.
Same thing Pard. Dust Def comes first in the list of stats so I listed it first.
Still Def 30% and Dam 70% though.
Edited by Mister Doom, 07 January 2014 - 18:35.
Posted 07 January 2014 - 18:51
So why is there a HP stat in the game? Seems it is only usefull if you are a critter....but for players HP is useless?
Even down here at lower levels HP is valuable in PvP/GvG and Arena. it is a handy stat to have as a player if used properly. But for the players with little to no PvP use for an item it is as you say, useless.
Posted 07 January 2014 - 19:30
BigGrim the poll seems to be showing a pretty big majority with the 1's voting no not even being near the level to wear the items.
So everyone who could wear this set would prefer the change to the current situation. I think it would make sense to make a quick change so many can go out and still enjoy the event.
Posted 07 January 2014 - 19:48
I agree with Leos.
The stats don't make any sense whatsoever.
Yes to the quick change.
Posted 07 January 2014 - 20:37
maybe another way to prove to grim how badly this set needs changing is, sorry for derailing, ...is there a setup that can be used for anything using THIS new 1800 set that couldnt be done better without it? except eg. i can get more hp/damage by using this set, as obviously that has no practical application.
Posted 07 January 2014 - 20:38
I voted no.
I agree with the title, the set should be altered, I just don't agree with having Def on a damage set, especially at the higher levels, looking at the sets I've used since 1300 or so and looking ahead majority of damage oriented gear(mainly used for hunting) is atk/DAM or ATK/dam, def is near on useless due to how easy you can pile up attack and use NMV to achieve whatever def you need, therefore I would like to see, if any change is made, an atk/dam set - keeps up with the trend that seems to be going on since level 1300 or so.
Edited by sohail94, 07 January 2014 - 20:38.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users