While you are fixing notifications, secure trade notifications don't work
Game Update v3.1.0
#41
Posted 31 March 2021 - 10:25
#42
Posted 31 March 2021 - 10:33
arena token rewards for placing not showing in logs
#43
Posted 31 March 2021 - 13:41
What's up with the AH sorry?
unable to use the Switch create mode in AH keeps telling to select 1 item to send, i dont want to click over 120 times for the same item to list in AH
Also i sent in a Support Ticket in about it 2-3 days ago with no response.
#44
Posted 31 March 2021 - 15:57
Some people are never happy. as a ladder player. taking a break at the moment the number of times i have gotten deflect 192 5 or 6 times in a row ruining a anti deflect 300 says its op. thank you for the nerf most ladder players sit in epics and relied on the 192 deflect buff it was so lame. I think deflect shouldnt be a thing on the ladder. Then theses wannbe pvpers wouldnt sit in epics 24/7 use a composer pot then hit and then back into epics and then your spent 4-7 hours trying to take the lead while they sit unbuffed in epics with a deflect 192, few other buffs, hi 5 to that nerf
#45
Posted 31 March 2021 - 16:14
Thanks for the update and fixes Cows, however:
I am NOT a fan of rolling back buff levels that have been available for YEARS based on the continuous complaints of a handful of players (the same few names complain about this relentlessly).... The silent majority appear to be happy with them (yes, I could be wrong, but if they were unhappy they probably wouldn't be so silent).... Please rollback these rollbacks as they just pander to handful of players that want the game to be built around what THEY want, not what the majority are happy enough with to not complain...
PS - before anybody lays into me about pvp - I have spent plenty of time on the ladder and annoying as deflect/fumble 192 wee they were equally available to everyone... Rolling back is akin to starting on the path to a WIN button - how long before there are demands to nerf protective buffs entirely? *rolls eyes*
Edited by LordOfRuin, 31 March 2021 - 16:35.
- winemaker, Raku, tlthomasjr and 3 others like this
#46
Posted 31 March 2021 - 16:58
Thanks for the update and fixes Cows, however:
I am NOT a fan of rolling back buff levels that have been available for YEARS based on the continuous complaints of a handful of players (the same few names complain about this relentlessly).... The silent majority appear to be happy with them (yes, I could be wrong, but if they were unhappy they probably wouldn't be so silent).... Please rollback these rollbacks as they just pander to handful of players that want the game to be built around what THEY want, not what the majority are happy enough with to not complain...
actually, a good point, but the complaints were mostly on buffs at 200.
PS - before anybody lays into me about pvp - I have spent plenty of time on the ladder and annoying as deflect/fumble 192 wee they were equally available to everyone... Rolling back is akin to starting on the path to a WIN button - how long before there are demands to nerf protective entirely? *rolls eyes*
"annoying" sounds problematic, so problem solved.
#47
Posted 31 March 2021 - 17:02
"annoying" sounds problematic, so problem solved.
Problematic is problematic, annoying is just that... an annoyance, nothing more
- wil72 and tlthomasjr like this
#48
Posted 31 March 2021 - 17:09
actually, a good point, but the complaints were mostly on buffs at 200.
Yet they went beyond stopping it from hitting 200 and rolled the skills back to 175. All they had to do was NOT INCREASE Buff Enhancer on composting.
- tlthomasjr and LordOfRuin like this
#49
Posted 31 March 2021 - 17:41
Problematic is problematic, annoying is just that... an annoyance, nothing more
annoyance or a bother is a problem. a small problem but still a problem.
actually, a good point, but the complaints were mostly on buffs at 200.0
Yet they went beyond stopping it from hitting 200 and rolled the skills back to 175. All they had to do was NOT INCREASE Buff Enhancer on composting.
concern was with a few buffs, better to cap those buffs.
the argument being made is: it matters bc it doesn't matter.
the counter-argument: example of negative affect and possible solution.
#50
Posted 31 March 2021 - 18:03
Thanks for listening to players and doing stuff accordingly, thanks for fixes too
Edited by Artzik, 31 March 2021 - 18:04.
#52
Posted 31 March 2021 - 18:07
annoyance or a bother is a problem. a small problem but still a problem.
No, that is why we have more than one word - accuracy of description
concern was with a few buffs, better to cap those buffs.
CAP - exactly.. NOT rollback
the argument being made is: it matters bc it doesn't matter.
the counter-argument: example of negative affect and possible solution.
Not entirely sure what you mean by this - it is certainly not the argument I am making - perhaps a response to a different post?
- winemaker and tlthomasjr like this
#53
Posted 31 March 2021 - 19:22
Well I never, there's a first. Not once, never, not even a maybe have I seen player suggestion be implemented so quickly into the game. Ok. it's not exactly what was asked for but it's pretty damn close. And these changes have appeared with such little "community" feedback. Do I need to attend Discord? Please tell me this is not so.
And just to satisfy my curiosity, others may wish clarification too. Why have Fumble, Deflect and Unbreakable been singled out for level limitations? I mean, you suggest the buffs Fumble and Deflect are of concern. Can you please expand on this; why are they concerning and to whom? What damage are these particular buffs causing the game? As they must to deserve the nerf.
Just an after thought as I scribe this. Do you intend to introduce potions which contain Fumble or Deflect at a higher level than can now be cast? Would seem a reasonable question since we have Unbreakable 200 in the Loyalty section. Wait! Why not add these 2 new potions to Loyalty!! Loyalty needs some love, right?
Cheers,
wil72
Edited by wil72, 31 March 2021 - 19:27.
#54
Posted 01 April 2021 - 01:02
removed due to duplication
if done on purpose, then funny.
annoyances are problems, not all problems are annoyances. since cap is a "rollback" of recent changes, your argument is not clear. also, words are defined and delineated by other words. your "definition argument" lacks accuracy.annoyance or a bother is a problem. a small problem but still a problem.
No, that is why we have more than one word - accuracy of description
concern was with a few buffs, better to cap those buffs.
CAP - exactly.. NOT rollback
the argument being made is: it matters bc it doesn't matter.
the counter-argument: example of negative affect and possible solution.
Not entirely sure what you mean by this - it is certainly not the argument I am making - perhaps a response to a different post?
the post is:Well I never, there's a first. Not once, never, not even a maybe have I seen player suggestion be implemented so quickly into the game. Ok. it's not exactly what was asked for but it's pretty damn close. And these changes have appeared with such little "community" feedback. Do I need to attend Discord? Please tell me this is not so.
And just to satisfy my curiosity, others may wish clarification too. Why have Fumble, Deflect and Unbreakable been singled out for level limitations? I mean, you suggest the buffs Fumble and Deflect are of concern. Can you please expand on this; why are they concerning and to whom? What damage are these particular buffs causing the game? As they must to deserve the nerf.
Just an after thought as I scribe this. Do you intend to introduce potions which contain Fumble or Deflect at a higher level than can now be cast? Would seem a reasonable question since we have Unbreakable 200 in the Loyalty section. Wait! Why not add these 2 new potions to Loyalty!! Loyalty needs some love, right?
Cheers,
wil72
Potential balance changes-buffs
pls reread the op
#55
Posted 01 April 2021 - 01:23
unable to use the Switch create mode in AH keeps telling to select 1 item to send, i dont want to click over 120 times for the same item to list in AH
Also i sent in a Support Ticket in about it 2-3 days ago with no response.
In switch Create Mode I select the item and when new window pops up (step 2) I set time, price and amount of the item to auction.
When I click Create Auction it sends me pack to Step 1 and displays this message
"You need to select at least one item to send"
Considering you have to select an item to access Step 2...
Edited by WandKing, 01 April 2021 - 01:26.
#56
Posted 01 April 2021 - 15:24
#57
Posted 01 April 2021 - 20:45
As stated before, we would like to stress that these buff changes are not final and that we'll be entering a trial period with them. We would love to hear your feedback over the coming week or so, and we'd very much like to run a poll.
Thank you Arioche for listening to community and acting on it, but I have one consern left... usually the polls are won in FS by the majority of FS players that have no freaking idea about game mechanics and how it works and not, they just vote as they feel, you should gather a council of 20 or something esteemed players and use their insight to game to your advantage. you can poll the players and they make the decisions with you, that might work...
Edited by Artzik, 01 April 2021 - 20:48.
#58
Posted 01 April 2021 - 20:50
Polls are great for gauging the communities general interest IMO not balance changes. Things such as this require data and an expert on the HCS team to read that data.
For example there won't be a single PvP thing to pass the poll because the Non-Pvpers outnumber the Pvpers. PvP has been under attack in this game for years and most of them have since quit.
Edited by EpicPiety, 01 April 2021 - 20:52.
#59
Posted 01 April 2021 - 20:54
yeah like the pvp seasons, the single best thing ever happened to this game
- Removed4427 likes this
#60
Posted 01 April 2021 - 21:01
yeah like the pvp seasons, the single best thing ever happened to this game
Minus the Bounty Board update that came with it.
- yotekiller and FatFingr like this
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users