![](/public/style_images/thoreau_dark/profile/default_large.png)
*Rate the Signature above you*
#61
fs_bladeboss
Posted 10 February 2008 - 16:56
#62
fs_briggzy
Posted 10 February 2008 - 17:00
#63
fs_bladeboss
Posted 10 February 2008 - 17:01
![:)](/public/style_emoticons/default/smile.png)
#64
fs_brishu
Posted 11 February 2008 - 06:40
#65
fs_briggzy
Posted 12 February 2008 - 00:29
#66
fs_brishu
Posted 12 February 2008 - 00:32
u is the getty a 9 & 10
![:)](/public/style_emoticons/default/smile.png)
#67
fs_tawniteamo
Posted 12 February 2008 - 05:55
thnx ...
u is the getty a 9 & 10....
hm...6/10 definitely improved since the last of yours I saw.
#68
fs_brishu
Posted 12 February 2008 - 06:22
7/10
#69
fs_briggzy
Posted 18 February 2008 - 20:36
#70
Posted 18 February 2008 - 21:04
9/10 on the top one
![:D](/public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.png)
10/10 on the bottom...
the top one is just a bit too big heightwise for my taste
![:P](/public/style_emoticons/default/tongue.png)
I hope one day my stuff all looks that good though
![:D](/public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.png)
#71
fs_yukio
Posted 20 February 2008 - 17:42
Pretty good.
Needs some depth though...and flow. :wink:
The lighting in the bottom covers some of the focal a bit...You should have tried to lower the lightings opacity and used a darkblue soft brush over it and set it to dodge at 70-80% :roll:
Also, i "hate" that neg space in the right
![:D](/public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.png)
Colors are pretty good, nice use of C4Ds, also a good text right there.
#72
fs_briggzy
Posted 20 February 2008 - 17:49
![:lol:](/public/style_emoticons/default/laugh.png)
#73
fs_yukio
Posted 20 February 2008 - 17:55
8/10, atleast someone on this forum other than me knows how to smudge properly
lol
![:lol:](/public/style_emoticons/default/laugh.png)
To your surprise, nothing in that sig was smudged
![:lol:](/public/style_emoticons/default/laugh.png)
![:lol:](/public/style_emoticons/default/laugh.png)
Anyway you sigs 9/10 both. Second one is better imo.
#74
fs_briggzy
Posted 20 February 2008 - 19:00
8/10, atleast someone on this forum other than me knows how to smudge properly
lol![]()
To your surprise, nothing in that sig was smudged. Its C4Ds over C4Ds over C4Ds over a lot of teeny tiny clipmasks lol
![]()
Anyway you sigs 9/10 both. Second one is better imo.
oh lol, it looks a bit like it was smudged with a spatter brush
#75
fs_deemer
Posted 20 February 2008 - 21:09
![:)](/public/style_emoticons/default/smile.png)
#76
fs_brishu
Posted 21 February 2008 - 03:26
anyway faramir ... you a get an 8/10 mostly cause its too bright for my taste ......
Rocksta ..... you get a 1 ...... i can see neither the render nor the background properly or at all ...... the text is a too obvious there no indication taht work was actaully done ... i suggest increasing the opacity to make it more visible (yes i KNOW he doesnt have a sig ... but since he decided to be wise&*$ ... i decided to be one as well)
any way ......
![Posted Image](http://i257.photobucket.com/albums/hh240/brishu/jamie.jpg)
#77
fs_cheetos185
Posted 21 February 2008 - 18:55
#78
fs_brishu
Posted 22 February 2008 - 03:44
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ .........
![:)](/public/style_emoticons/default/smile.png)
![Posted Image](http://i257.photobucket.com/albums/hh240/brishu/tsubasa_1024a2.jpg)
![Posted Image](http://i257.photobucket.com/albums/hh240/brishu/cloud.jpg)
#79
fs_rathalos9
Posted 22 February 2008 - 14:41
not youre best follow a TUT
i dont like the smuding or text
#80
fs_derbon
Posted 23 February 2008 - 05:15
it desn't blend a whole lot....
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users