I think the issue is that due to the stat bonus from the forge levels being a fixed amount rather than a percentage it just doesn't seem so worth it at higher levels.
Fully agree on that. I haven't forged in ages over 4FF because of what I consider, personally, to be exorbitant costs for little gain. And I've also felt that even 4 was going too far, lol.
However, we both know that there are players in game that want the "best" available.
For me... well... I've only seen a couple posts to this end... But the fact is that if a level XXXX item doesn't "need to be" forged currently, what incentive would a reduced cost give?
Smart guilds with intelligent leaders, unlike myself, would have zero incentive to forge even at these reduced costs since the stats are already enough to get the job done.
Grant it, this may be just a pure-hunting position and "might" be changed for other game aspects (heck, I like some stat increases on Titans I don't (not can't) one-hit.
My point is... from a global FS standpoint... I'm just wondering if the 2.3 million or whatever gold reduction in forging costs is positive for the game considering the gold sink effect. That is to say, if it doesn't severely increase forging... then all it is doing is decreasing an already present gold-sink.
Am I babbling incoherently yet? lol. Sorry )o0... I really hope the message gets across.I
In short, I will continue to forge up to 4FF and won't bother with 5FF and I will do this at a reduced cost to current prices.
If and only if, the FS community as a whole sees a viable benefit to forging more than what they are currently doing will this have a positive game effect.
On another note I care absolutely nothing about... this should theoretically reduce the cost of all currently forged items in the AH, lmao.
If the gold was capped at level 1,000 I'd certainly be more inclined to consider forging up items.
I used to be ferocious in making all my stuff perf/FF. I abandoned the FF thing quite some time ago when it got prohibitively expensive.
That is exactly what I was asking in the above "way too long response", lol.
To go a bit further, is the renewed interest sustainable?
I think Shar's comment is relevant and that "I'd certainly be more inclined" should be "highlighted".
Again, "more inclined"... for me that's the crux.
I myself am an idiot. I shared Shar's opinion that 5 FFs was way out of my range. I still did and do 4, idiot that I am (or so I think).
We can assume that I will continue to stupidly 4 FF items. In this case, unless there is enough increased forging to cover the gold sink lost on my reduced costs, this actually "hurts" the game because of gold sink.
In other words, unless Shar, over a sustainable period, becomes convinced that forging is worthwhile for the added benefits and that decision surpasses what I, Egami, save on my forging costs then I think the reduction is detrimental to the game.