A : ALL the gold be transferred at one time?
All at once. Though to be honest, I much prefer the idea of a Preference to make the seller anonymous. That would work better.
Posted 19 December 2012 - 11:19
A : ALL the gold be transferred at one time?
Posted 19 December 2012 - 11:40
A : ALL the gold be transferred at one time?
All at once. Though to be honest, I much prefer the idea of a Preference to make the seller anonymous. That would work better.
Posted 19 December 2012 - 12:09
A : ALL the gold be transferred at one time?
All at once. Though to be honest, I much prefer the idea of a Preference to make the seller anonymous. That would work better.
that would get a vote of agreeance from me.
Posted 19 December 2012 - 12:40
A : ALL the gold be transferred at one time?
All at once. Though to be honest, I much prefer the idea of a Preference to make the seller anonymous. That would work better.
Posted 19 December 2012 - 13:45
it should be optional for the seller to be anonymousA : ALL the gold be transferred at one time?
All at once. Though to be honest, I much prefer the idea of a Preference to make the seller anonymous. That would work better.
Posted 19 December 2012 - 14:08
That's why Grim said make it a preference, to enable or disable at the sellers discretion.it should be optional for the seller to be anonymousA : ALL the gold be transferred at one time?
All at once. Though to be honest, I much prefer the idea of a Preference to make the seller anonymous. That would work better.
Posted 19 December 2012 - 17:51
please don't take out the community and personal aspect of the Auction House with this bandaid..which is sure to fall off anyways :twisted:A : ALL the gold be transferred at one time?
All at once. Though to be honest, I much prefer the idea of a Preference to make the seller anonymous. That would work better.
Posted 19 December 2012 - 23:37
A : ALL the gold be transferred at one time?
All at once. Though to be honest, I much prefer the idea of a Preference to make the seller anonymous. That would
work better.
Posted 20 December 2012 - 00:42
Posted 20 December 2012 - 04:01
Posted 20 December 2012 - 04:02
just pointing out there was a time when these pots sold for and fsp or two, if that became the norm again im sure rates for farmers would increase which to my knowledge is an absolute waste of stam at current rates.
Posted 20 December 2012 - 04:04
You only gain prestige from pvp hits, 10, once every 3 days from the Same person, Inc the ladder. And yes the BB also, 1 each hit. However it is only when xp loss occurred.can't you only get Prestige from Bounty Board and Ladder hits?RIP Prestige? Did you guys consider that pvp prestige occurs ONLY if xp loss occurs?
Posted 20 December 2012 - 05:46
Sidenote: Why are people allowed to bounty deflected hits? I would think that after the "you can bounty for EACH hit" rule, that they would have adjusted the bountying deflects rule. Seems very unfair to me because they already benefited from being saved from pvp combat. huge deterrent for pvping in my opinion.
Posted 20 December 2012 - 10:28
just pointing out there was a time when these pots sold for and fsp or two, if that became the norm again im sure rates for farmers would increase which to my knowledge is an absolute waste of stam at current rates.
Game resources are still going at a descent price. but Resource Finder buff killed the regular plant market. Although, I suspect hunting potions will be selling for a premium during the event and probably for a few days afterwards.
Posted 21 December 2012 - 00:13
Sidenote: Why are people allowed to bounty deflected hits? I would think that after the "you can bounty for EACH hit" rule, that they would have adjusted the bountying deflects rule. Seems very unfair to me because they already benefited from being saved from pvp combat. huge deterrent for pvping in my opinion.
The intent is clear, regardless of the outcome, so yes, imo, they should keep the "any hit, successful or not, should be bountyable.."
Posted 21 December 2012 - 00:23
Next time don't activate Honor on a player before 10 stamming them.Well don't expect a lot of people to try or like pvp then. I thought the cows were trying to open it up for people to try / enjoy, hence my comment about it. Keep in mind you only get a portion of the total gold they have on-hand (most feel master thief rarely kicks in) and you are likely to get bountied for the hit as well.
Posted 21 December 2012 - 01:38
Screenshot everything!
Posted 21 December 2012 - 01:54
I think with this update you should change the code in the find player function so that you can't simply type in the level range you can hit and have the players' gold amounts pop up instantly, like shooting fish in a barrel. Go back to the good ol' days where you had to search for people to find if they had gold on them or not. Stop making things too easy.
Remove the attack helper for creatures too then? Make players figure out what stats they need to hit safely on their own Just sayin, if we want to stop making things easy...
Posted 21 December 2012 - 09:05
Posted 21 December 2012 - 12:10
I hope that HCS doesnt change the xp event date too... I did two small hunts just to get max stam @2pm today, as they said it would be that timeThere is no thread open for this but why did you (Hunted Cows) decide to postpone the xmas points by another 12 hours?? It means for me that after not using my stam for a hunt and expecting my purchased points on the 21st as promised I now have to wait until the 22nd to receive anything - and the xp loss is massive given I can only hunt once a week. It means effecitively that the double xp event is just going to make up for theses losses. Thanks cows, awesome desicion :twisted:
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users