Jump to content

Photo

Guild RP Revamp


  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

Poll: Guild RP Revamp (5 member(s) have cast votes)

Do you like these buffs ?

  1. Yes !! (2 votes [40.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 40.00%

  2. No... (3 votes [60.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 60.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 Tartarus1

Tartarus1

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 279 posts

Posted 14 February 2020 - 10:43

Take down rp cost by 4 times and add stalker to last xp buff pack.

x4 cost  reduction is too much for their buff level so I lowered a bit.

 

Removed doubler and replaced it with stalker (we already have too many doubler pots available in game).



#22 vlkfenrir

vlkfenrir

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 393 posts

Posted 16 February 2020 - 10:04

Reducing conflict cooldown is something that should not happen in my opinion.



#23 gapukas

gapukas

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 169 posts
  • Badge

Posted 17 February 2020 - 15:39

Reducing conflict cooldown is something that should not happen in my opinion.

up to 30% is not a big deal, most of the time when your doing massive gvg's your always out of targets or on cooldowns - there arent as many guilds as there used to be. It cuts down cooldown from 7 days to like 5 days. And when you finally earn the 30% cooldown you well deserve it for the hassle.


Edited by gapukas, 17 February 2020 - 15:41.


#24 BadPenny

BadPenny

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,566 posts
  • United States of America

Posted 17 February 2020 - 19:06

up to 30% is not a big deal, most of the time when your doing massive gvg's your always out of targets or on cooldowns - there arent as many guilds as there used to be. It cuts down cooldown from 7 days to like 5 days. And when you finally earn the 30% cooldown you well deserve it for the hassle.

The cooldown was first initiated because of RP farmers.  It only slows them down, but doesn't stop them.  Reducing the cooldown would only make this practice worse......  


Just one old lady's opinion

 

~Love, Penny

AZxelNi.jpg

 

Have you hugged your Quango lately?


#25 gapukas

gapukas

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 169 posts
  • Badge

Posted 19 February 2020 - 23:23

The cooldown was first initiated because of RP farmers.  It only slows them down, but doesn't stop them.  Reducing the cooldown would only make this practice worse......  

Did you look at the cost to get the 30%? total 500m gp, + total 7700 RP - thats an insane cost.



#26 BadPenny

BadPenny

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,566 posts
  • United States of America

Posted 20 February 2020 - 01:57

Did you look at the cost to get the 30%? total 500m gp, + total 7700 RP - thats an insane cost.

Bet AF or Trip could get there easily, I know they GvG pretty regularly.  There is the lack of targets in range, however.  That's something that should be expanded, especially 1500+.

 

But reducing the cooldown period could become a nightmare of exploitation.  Eliminating it entirely would send FS back to the dark ages.  

 

I don't disagree that the entire GvG system needs an overhaul, but imho the cooldown is just fine as is.  


Edited by BadPenny, 20 February 2020 - 01:58.

Just one old lady's opinion

 

~Love, Penny

AZxelNi.jpg

 

Have you hugged your Quango lately?


#27 Tartarus1

Tartarus1

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 279 posts

Posted 22 February 2020 - 14:11

Well after thinking I think the CD is a bit too much so here's an ultimatum to this problem :

 

Completely remove the cd aspect OR make cd 5%/6%/7%/8%/10%

 

Which do you guys prefer ?




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Font:
Arial | Calibri | Lucida Console | Verdana
 
Font Size:
9px | 10px | 11px | 12px | 10pt | 12pt
 
Color: