Nope, the set as a whole is nothing special. Cracked Lava is better and it's still rubbish. Go with the deep set if you can afford it.
is the Frost Giant set worth the FSP and time
Started by
fs_krypkill
, Sep 17 2007 06:41
8 replies to this topic
#2
fs_narex
fs_narex
-
- Guests
Posted 17 September 2007 - 19:34
It works in a few levels, where you need lots of attack and less damage. I think I used it in the 110-115 zones.
#4
Posted 29 September 2007 - 17:44
I leveled with this set per 100-120lv, and don't have any problems.
#5
Posted 29 September 2007 - 21:03
deep works beter if u can afford it. and if not go with decayed.
#6
Posted 29 September 2007 - 22:29
When i've this lv Deep and Decay does't exist;) Now of corurs, Deep. Decay is better. But Frost Giant Armor is still great if you need Arm.
#7
fs_deemer
fs_deemer
-
- Guests
Posted 30 September 2007 - 00:55
not worth it. Frost Giant Armor is good but teh rest is *french accent* garbage
use Deep set or if you cant afford it Cracked Lava.
use Deep set or if you cant afford it Cracked Lava.
#8
Posted 30 September 2007 - 14:04
When i've this lv Deep and Decay does't exist;) Now of corurs, Deep. Decay is better. But Frost Giant Armor is still great if you need Arm.
well now it does lol.
back in my days the only good set we had was frost dragon anf fire dragon and then the reg elite stuff. that took most of us past deep set when it came out
#9
fs_maegglin
fs_maegglin
-
- Guests
Posted 30 September 2007 - 16:33
Decay is cheaper then Deep or Frost giant, starts earlier then frost giant and lasts longer. What was the question again ? :)
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users