4 replies to this topic

[RodasPT]

hum... what's the logic to allow 8 of 9 Silos available, on Theta 1, be occupied with the most powerful alliance on the region?

 

So, the idea is to allow the strongers get strongers right ?

 

This in long term will force lower players to go away...

[INDeeDO]

hum... what's the logic to allow 8 of 9 Silos available, on Theta 1, be occupied with the most powerful alliance on the region?

 

So, the idea is to allow the strongers get strongers right ?

 

This in long term will force lower players to go away...

if the unbalance of P2W vs free players already hasnt...

but in essence nukes do not do much,just a show of power

Edited by INDeeDO, 12 May 2017 - 22:53.

[Mojawk]

Thanks for your feedback on this, the idea behind the silo was to create healthy competition between alliances, Silos are something we could certainly improve in the future.

[INDeeDO]

Thanks for your feedback on this, the idea behind the silo was to create healthy competition between alliances, Silos are something we could certainly improve in the future.

if this is to be so,the silos need to be buffed somehow,because in my experience the silos are not fought over,and it's not healthy because any troops that are lost,are lost for ever

Edited by INDeeDO, 15 May 2017 - 19:36.

[Buffarilla]

 the idea behind the silo was to create healthy competition between alliances

There is no healthy competition in the game, that's the problem.  1 player with 200M plus power is untouchable and can reinforce all of his alliance/alternate accounts so they are untouchable as well.  Then they park reinforced outposts around the silos and the cost to dislodge them is too much.