jinks

Moon, a few points.

 

I thought you were 3rd and we were 4th in Top Guild list?

 

My post wasn't majorly aimed at TED, it was aimed at HCS, I don't feel they know the game mechanics or individual aspects of their game enough to make sound judgement on the changes they consider and then implement.  They look at the views/demands/opinions posted on here and decide from that...my point was  those views are increasingly from members of TED of friends of.  You use this to your advantage, which I can't really blame you for.

 

An idea was posted around a long time ago of the community 'electing' a number of players knowledgeable in each aspect of the game to discuss updates with HCS before concepts and implementation. I was a fan of that idea, but it never got anywhere, obviously there would be possible flaws and manipulation of this as well, but its more likely to get us closer to a positive update than the last 5 or 6 have been.

 

As for your last point, if it didn't mess WaL's GXP up (I've been here since I was about 340), I would honestly take you up on the offer.  Other than a few instances of pot - kettle - black type stuff related to 'double-dipping' I don't overly dislike TED at all.

I fully expect this to be deleted and I'll probably get banned...or horribly I'll get 'smashed'

 

HCS please stop giving TED absolutely everything they ask for.

 

They didn't want a change to the PvP ladder because they flooded it and smashed the crap out of everyone who joined (that in itself isn't against any game rules.)

When you changed it, they wanted it changed back because they wouldn't then be able to use their famed 'PvP' rules to bash anyone who looked at them sideways.

Then you gave sliding scales on Prestige, which I'm pretty sure they championed the idea of.

Then giving stam gain on PvP gear

Now making resources unbound because they have tons from the first point I made.

 

In short every update in the last 3 months has been pushed by them.

 

I liked some of the new PvP changes, I think you should have done Beta testing to work it all out rather than a wholesale change then when it was complained about by 'some' you changed it back totally rather than making any adjustments.

 

I guess some of the blame can be attributed to the rest of the community as nowhere near as many outside of TED and their friends post on here to give their opinion.  And when they do, multiple TED players attempt to disrepute the idea or views as swiftly as possible.

 

You're banging the remaining nails in the coffin HCS.

 

To everyone else, enjoy your game

Now you can opt in, bring back xp loss on rated attacks. Or give it a 'PVP' rating to win and lose...oh wait we had that before :/

Right now we're just trading invisible points with minimal gold loss but nothing else.

On the upside the board is busier than ever

So it's Thursday after 5, you guys have likely gone home now and no server capacity increase...looks like just before the event again then?

Please increase the server capacity and test early in the week, so any possible bugs are ironed out before you hit the Double Event button.

 

I recall you guys did something similar last XP Event at the same time you started it and it ruined the first 36 hours of the event so much you had to extend it.