Player A requests an avatar. He/she gets the avatar, asks for changes on the avatar, and does not pay yet because he/she is waiting for someone else to make him/her the avatar, and will 'judge' which is the best, and pay for it. Is that considered 'okay'?
EDIT: To clarify, 'Player A' is a customer of mine..
Player purchasing an avatar scenario
Started by
fs_akghicjfh
, Mar 28 2009 22:24
4 replies to this topic
#1 fs_akghicjfh
Posted 28 March 2009 - 22:24
#2
Posted 28 March 2009 - 22:27
Not cool...run a contest
#3 fs_negrumir
Posted 28 March 2009 - 22:44
True, It's not good form. But there are no rules to stop them, (that I know of)
And they could've just made off with both of them and not paid at all...
And they could've just made off with both of them and not paid at all...
#4
Posted 28 March 2009 - 23:39
No its darned ignorant of them if you ask me (and you kinda did lol)
I always now take a down payment to protect against that sort of thing, if they not happy paying downpayment they can go somewhere else simple as.
I always now take a down payment to protect against that sort of thing, if they not happy paying downpayment they can go somewhere else simple as.
#5 fs_khalsa500
Posted 29 March 2009 - 02:39
unless it was agreed upon beforehand, this is unacceptable.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users