Jump to content

Gameplay flaws + solution + Poll to agree


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

Poll: What do you think? (20 member(s) have cast votes)

What do you think?

  1. Strongly agree with both points (3 votes [42.86%])

    Percentage of vote: 42.86%

  2. Agree with point 1, not 2 (1 votes [14.29%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.29%

  3. Agree with point 2, not 1 (3 votes [42.86%])

    Percentage of vote: 42.86%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 fs_fighterdan

fs_fighterdan
  • Guests

Posted 01 October 2007 - 12:03

That's why I suggested Dual fights. :P BTW, Should be in Suggestions.

#2 fs_grrraham

fs_grrraham
  • Guests

Posted 01 October 2007 - 12:26

1 - alot of quest locations all ready have some kind of building, tuft of grass, different colour grass etc.

2 - If there was no lvl restriction whats to stop new players going to realms where they dont have a hope, its all ready bad enough with the etheral city. Surely havin restrictions to have goals to aim for so you can get to the next level is what games are about. Its like whats the point in playing something like bubble bobble, complete the last lvl and thats it?

i voted no to both, i was second to do so :P

#3 dragos

dragos

    New Member

  • New Members
  • Pip
  • 48 posts

Posted 01 October 2007 - 14:04

Voted Strongly disagree with both points... reason... just read what grrraham said :)

#4 fs_crace

fs_crace
  • Guests

Posted 01 October 2007 - 16:46

I strongly disagree to both too.

It's bad enough having the complaints we currently have about xp lost when creatures kill. You do realise the higher level the creature, the more xp you lose don't you? :lol:

In a few levels you'll soon reach a plateau where you will no longer worry about killing creatures too easily.

As for quests, some people like to actually search for them. I think the graphics that are on some locations are fine as they are. Ones that don't have markers are meant to be hard to find.

#5 allenplay

allenplay

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 320 posts

Posted 01 October 2007 - 21:46

Thanks for your opinions everyone, most appreciated.

Another idea I have is for instant item trash when you find an item...
Since you can only hold three items id like an option to trash the loot OR add to backpack. Perhaps if you trash it you could collect a small amount of gold?

The more "clicks" they can remove, the faster the game will load. At the moment to trash an item its PROFILE, MANAGE, CHECKBOX, CONFIRM, BACK TO WORLD.....

Dialup players outside USA suffer greatly per click

How about "You find amethyst ring. keep? Yes/No".... ?

There is a lot of room for tricks like this!

Developers - please focus more on improving the game and less on FSP sponsors... A good game sells itself. This is not quite "good" yet. Its decent, though.... The limitations on backpack storage space seem a little cruel and money centered, dont you think?

Mistakes and Opinions:

#1:Nah, you can hold more than three items in your backpack, just upgrade.

#2:Why don't you just keep your backpack full, and then you won't have to collect any junk, or loot.

#3:Adding this option will use plenty of game memory.

#4:The DEVs can do whatever they want, they don't have to.

#6 fs_crace

fs_crace
  • Guests

Posted 01 October 2007 - 21:50

Dialup players outside USA suffer greatly per click


How exactly?

How about "You find amethyst ring. keep? Yes/No".... ?


That would actually be far worse - far more requests to the db per person.

Instead, when the bp gets full, thats it, no more items. Works well. You'll soon realise most of it is junk anyway. :lol:

#7 fs_bladeboss

fs_bladeboss
  • Guests

Posted 02 October 2007 - 02:07

I disagree to both Points..just read Ice DNx's post :D


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Font:
Arial | Calibri | Lucida Console | Verdana
 
Font Size:
9px | 10px | 11px | 12px | 10pt | 12pt
 
Color: