Posted 13 August 2019 - 23:18
I'm not going to lie i assumed it was intentional. It was my intention to create a difficult to make set that pulls activity into various different facets of the game. Because of this it was my intention for the set to be a cut above the rest. I had assumed the armor piece had extra stats because if the weapon had the same EW would make it really strong. EW comes as high as 1500+ while EA comes 200+.
That was just my rationalization though. Even if it was a mistake maybe it is one of those occasions where it was meant to be?
EP
It seems, that given the difficulty and expense incurred, it SHOULD be allowed to stand as it was originally implemented, especially as that was your intention as the designer.
Now it's just another "run of the mill" LE set
Homer : Marge, don't discourage the boy. Weaseling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals .. except the weasel.
Eddie Izzard : The National Rifle Association say that guns don't kill people, people do. But I think the gun helps, you know ? I think it helps. I think just standing there going "BANG" - that's not going to kill too many people, is it ?
I don't mean to sound pessimistic, but it seems that everything I eat lately turns to poo ...