Jump to content

Photo

benefits


  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

Poll: agree or disgree? (16 member(s) have cast votes)

agree or disgree?

  1. agree (4 votes [21.05%])

    Percentage of vote: 21.05%

  2. disagree (15 votes [78.95%])

    Percentage of vote: 78.95%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 fs_mrwright

fs_mrwright
  • Guests

Posted 23 October 2007 - 00:29

The game doesnt give benefits for number of members unless you include what they are probably gonna do to the fury shrine, it then benefits smaller guilds.


So what? So far all you've done is complain that you're not getting something for nothing.
Why not come up with a workable idea?

#22 fs_dikkedwerg

fs_dikkedwerg
  • Guests

Posted 23 October 2007 - 00:29

than i disagree...its not all about the members...
i also didnt vote for the last option of Fury Shrine,
im also against that. 50% for all guild or nothing
for all. Not member based system.
I can give a very clear example: TEW has just as
much slots as members they have (77 if im right).
We have 119 slots. They are above us. So we will
get the benefits and they wont...doesnt look fair to
me...so keep it rank based or dont do it at all!

#23 spidey101

spidey101

    Veteran

  • New Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,036 posts

Posted 23 October 2007 - 00:33

The game doesnt give benefits for number of members unless you include what they are probably gonna do to the fury shrine, it then benefits smaller guilds.


So what? So far all you've done is complain that you're not getting something for nothing.
Why not come up with a workable idea?


ok workable idea is me playing war with you.

#24 fs_mrwright

fs_mrwright
  • Guests

Posted 23 October 2007 - 00:44

ok workable idea is me playing war with you.


There we go! Get some cards and we'll play :lol:

#25 fs_blackroija

fs_blackroija
  • Guests

Posted 23 October 2007 - 01:20

Spidey, I always thought you were one of the more competent people around here, but If you can't see that bigger guilds already have the advantage and always will have the advantage then maybe I was wrong.

You see it goes something like this

More players = more money = more stuff
Less players = less money = less stuff

more > less

You find me a 'small' guild that has all structures fully upgraded and I will eat my shoe

Let me also say that I don't like the idea of decreasing the cost of stuff for smaller guilds, level playing field and such, but larger guilds do not need any bonuses apart from the ones that are inherent in being a larger guild

#26 fs_fuzzysack0

fs_fuzzysack0
  • Guests

Posted 20 November 2007 - 18:51

Hey, another awesome way to give even more benefits to larger guilds when the larger guilds already have an enourmous advantage over smaller ones.

NEXT!

pills11.com ;))


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Font:
Arial | Calibri | Lucida Console | Verdana
 
Font Size:
9px | 10px | 11px | 12px | 10pt | 12pt
 
Color: