Buff Merchent raise to Lib
#1
fs_arceus777
Posted 05 March 2008 - 16:01
#2
fs_sleepsalot
Posted 05 March 2008 - 16:03
#3
Posted 05 March 2008 - 16:38
we need *less* gold in game, not more!
#4
fs_evillove
Posted 05 March 2008 - 23:16
....If you raise the the percentage, then there would be even more gold, therefore this is not good...yes it may benefit the lower levels. Though their gold gain per day is sufficient enough to allow them to purchase items, repair items, buy buffs, and so on....
....Their guild can also support them, and gathering more gold into the game, is already an issue, getting even more gold will cause an even bigger issue. Besides us lvl 100+ gain enough to buy around a FSP a day.
---If lower leveled players save efficiently, and do not lose gold from creature defeats, then they are fine as they are. It was made for them to be able to earn enough for them to level and buy items, They do no need to be spectacular, just enough for them to be able to kill the creatures.
#5
Posted 05 March 2008 - 23:21
no, absolutely not.
we need *less* gold in game, not more!
Just as long as it's not less gold in my pockets, I don't care.
#6
Posted 06 March 2008 - 00:11
#7
fs_supmet
Posted 06 March 2008 - 00:19
im sick of hearing of these gold sinks. more gold cant hurt anything. theres a cap on the FSP so whats going to be hurt by more gold? nothing. just more gold for everyone to have which is awesome, right? *thumbs up*
By your reasoning, they should make it a 10,000% increase to gold gain, then EVERYONE will be happy. :roll:
#8
Posted 06 March 2008 - 01:40
#9
Posted 06 March 2008 - 02:48
im sick of hearing of these gold sinks. more gold cant hurt anything. theres a cap on the FSP so whats going to be hurt by more gold? nothing. just more gold for everyone to have which is awesome, right? *thumbs up*
By your reasoning, they should make it a 10,000% increase to gold gain, then EVERYONE will be happy. :roll:
yeaaa....by my reasoning....they should do that....yeaaa haha *thumbs down* to you
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

