all inactives under lev 10 should be kicked
#1
fs_badjoe
Posted 15 March 2008 - 14:14
#2
fs_sleepsalot
Posted 15 March 2008 - 16:50
Well I'm on your side in this but I think any in active should be after 180 days Not before
if there r less inactives the game servers could hold more data :idea:
#3
Posted 15 March 2008 - 17:44
#4
fs_evillove
Posted 15 March 2008 - 19:20
I say boot all inactives of ANY level.
That wouldn't be very wise....
--It could result in having someone who is a Lvl 250 or any other level, taking a holiday, or just taking a break to sort things out in real life....you can't guarantee that they have just quit the game and will never come back...
--Many things could have happened...
--Yes you could say that they notify HCS, however that will just waste their time.
--I can see why you would like to kick players who are inactive from the game and who are also only around lvl 10 or below....though there may be problems that arise from this.
--Yes perhaps people who have just gone on a break that just started the game and is Lvl 10....and you could say that they can just start over, since Lvl 10 isn't that hard to get to...
--This on the other hand isn't quite right, as they have in fact used their time to get there, whether or not they come back is up to them, there isn't that much positiveness of the fact that they will not return.
--Add to the fact that they may have gone on a buissness trip, and only just donated to the game to buy FSP's and used them or still have them stored. They would have lost this, and only to return and find their account deleted.
--This will cause much complaining and wasting of time, which could be spent for something else...
--Though unless you set it for a much longer deadline for people to come back online, then if they don't meet that deadline then they will be kicked, even so I still cannot see it working.
#5
fs_deemer
Posted 15 March 2008 - 19:22
Leave the inactives alone :evil: !! Give us a really good reason why we should kick them out ?
Exactly What He Said
#6
fs_tweak42o
Posted 15 March 2008 - 20:36
Basically server space = More space for people to join thus creating and bigger income for more ugrades in the future... But then again it's just an opinion of one person...
#7
Posted 15 March 2008 - 21:15
Did you know that there are likely over 2000 rouge black holes in our galaxy alone. Each of them can reach very high speeds, even in space terms, are each capable of destroying anything in their path, and are invisible. Well, goodnight!
#8
fs_crace
Posted 15 March 2008 - 21:18
1 year of inactivity=out. By then there's no way they'd come back.
Don't count on that - I know of several players who have recently returned after a years absence.
#9
fs_evillove
Posted 15 March 2008 - 21:32
1 year of inactivity=out. By then there's no way they'd come back.
Don't count on that - I know of several players who have recently returned after a years absence.
That is very true, that is why I do not agree with this idea. :roll:
As I stand with my first post.
#10
fs_vellihousu
Posted 15 March 2008 - 22:07
#11
fs_brishu
Posted 16 March 2008 - 00:19
Leave the inactives alone :evil: !! Give us a really good reason why we should kick them out ?
Exactly What He Said
#12
Posted 16 March 2008 - 04:07
#13
fs_evillove
Posted 16 March 2008 - 22:19
No. I went inactive when I was level 5, for 6 months, and then played again. What if some of them want to come back?
Exactly, that is why I disagree, still!
As before I still stand by my first post.
#14
fs_apep16
Posted 17 March 2008 - 06:07
I would say no because then there will never be 1,5mil legendary event :twisted:
nice comment :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
#15
Posted 17 March 2008 - 06:40
#16
fs_neotears
Posted 17 March 2008 - 06:56
One year and you're out. If you spent money on a game you just started two days ago (as stated, level 10 takes little time) then it's your fault you're stupid enough.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

