Attack Recently Online Player
#1
fs_kelrithian
Posted 21 April 2008 - 21:44
So...why is this list so useless? I seem to recall it being a whole lot more useful back in the day.
Just awhile ago...player "shana" showed up on my list. Repeatedly. I kept refreshing, in hopes that it would go away, to no avail. I come back an hour later to check again...still there.
"Attack Recently Online Player"...operative words being "recently" and "online". So unless "recently" is referring to some point in the past 6 months...this obviously does not apply to shana.
This list, used to show random players within your 5-level attack range, and I'm nearly positive that it used to mix it up a whole lot more. Now...it apparently only lists players of your exact virtual level, and it lists the exact same 5 players for hours at a time at least, as far as I can tell.
So what's up with that, seriously? Especially at higher levels, there are only so many people of your exact virtual level. For this reason alone, I would think having a list of anyone within your 5 level range, would be reasonable. I also find it a bit ridiculous that this list never seems to change, or only -extremely- infrequently. If I had to guess, I would say it only changes when either yourself or someone on the list...actually gains a level.
And if I had my way, this list would just be longer in general...10/15/20/25 names. I mean why not?
Even some sort of sorting option would be great. As in...list the highest PvP or Gold, at the top of the list. I doubt that will ever happen, just a thought. Thanks for listening.
#2
fs_deemer
Posted 22 April 2008 - 00:15
#3
fs_thelastdj
Posted 22 April 2008 - 00:46
Needs to be a longer list as Kel suggests, say up to 20 people. Also within the +/- 5 levels not just same level and updating or changing if not on a refresh, at least on a much more regular basis, say minute by minute. Hell, why stop at recently online, why not make it random.
I agree completely.
If this happens, though, I think that something else might have to be done (if the bounty board were fixed, somehow...) to fix PvP a bit more.
#4
Posted 22 April 2008 - 00:51
#5
fs_crispy983
Posted 22 April 2008 - 04:58
#6
Posted 22 April 2008 - 23:18
Needs to be a longer list as Kel suggests, say up to 20 people. Also within the +/- 5 levels not just same level and updating or changing if not on a refresh, at least on a much more regular basis, say minute by minute. Hell, why stop at recently online, why not make it random.
I agree. This need some attention. PLEASE!!!
#7
fs_sleepsalot
Posted 22 April 2008 - 23:27
Needs to be a longer list as Kel suggests, say up to 20 people. Also within the +/- 5 levels not just same level and updating or changing if not on a refresh, at least on a much more regular basis, say minute by minute. Hell, why stop at recently online, why not make it random.
#8
Posted 22 April 2008 - 23:43
#9
fs_thelastdj
Posted 23 April 2008 - 01:26
Note also we've been looking through the forum for good game suggestions and will be doing an update with many of them in the very near future
Really hope this is one of those "good game suggestions"...
#10
fs_brishu
Posted 23 April 2008 - 01:29
#11
Posted 26 April 2008 - 20:28
#12
Posted 26 April 2008 - 20:46
#13
fs_hatern
Posted 28 April 2008 - 00:44
I PvP ...so i am willing to gear up and prepare for a fight with a high lvl ..or a player like myself ...but at the same time ...i dont think you should be aloud to attack off line players . they should be on line to defend and counter . bouties of course can be cleared at any time ..
sorry for rambling on
#14
fs_death1799
Posted 28 April 2008 - 01:46
#15
Posted 30 April 2008 - 05:46
I say why not make it any random player who is +/- your current level, and regardless of when they have been online. Increase to 20 from 5 players to choose from.
...just my two cents :wink:
#16
fs_angiefc
Posted 30 April 2008 - 13:40
#17
fs_angiefc
Posted 30 April 2008 - 14:08
#18
fs_thelastdj
Posted 30 April 2008 - 20:09
#19
fs_kelrithian
Posted 08 May 2008 - 04:24
#20
fs_rulen
Posted 08 May 2008 - 04:37
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


