Jump to content

This is NOT about Personal Tagging


  • Please log in to reply
30 replies to this topic

Poll: Should we be allowed to "mark" items as undroppable? (50 member(s) have cast votes)

Should we be allowed to "mark" items as undroppable?

  1. Yes, I don't want to drop my Destroyer Sword instead of my Dunhar's Helm (32 votes [53.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 53.33%

  2. Nope, I never get nervous dropping stuff (11 votes [18.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 18.33%

  3. Rulen's option: This is good but Pie is better (So, Yes but give me pie or I say no) (17 votes [28.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 28.33%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 fs_ecolitan

fs_ecolitan
  • Guests

Posted 01 June 2008 - 15:55

Ok, I realize there's been a long list of threads about personal tagging. And, I agree it's a bad idea. I also don't like the idea of HCS implemented "loaning" of items. However, what about this option:

A player can pay a fee (gold) to mark an item in their inventory. Once marked the item cannot be dropped, auctioned or traded.

If backpack folders worked on the "drop items" screen this wouldn't be necessary. But I get nervous when I want to drop all my junk and it's mixed in with my FF'd legendary and SE sets. This would fix this and take some gold away.

#2 fs_myself18

fs_myself18
  • Guests

Posted 01 June 2008 - 16:34

This would be pretty nice. Even though I am extremely careful when dropping items, I'd still use it

#3 fs_rulen

fs_rulen
  • Guests

Posted 01 June 2008 - 16:48

Thanks Ecolitan!!

and I agree with my answer. I like pie and this idea.

oh and I understand this completely, everytime I go to drop common items, i'm afraid of some error or something and somehow checking my hunter items/ or void ring.

#4 fs_ecolitan

fs_ecolitan
  • Guests

Posted 01 June 2008 - 21:41

Rulen, any Hunter items you feel like dropping just send to me. I'll leave BP space open. ;)

#5 Dark Archon

Dark Archon

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,346 posts

Posted 01 June 2008 - 21:44

BLASPHEMY!!! Any option with pie should be credited to me... not rulen! >.>

#6 fs_evillove

fs_evillove
  • Guests

Posted 01 June 2008 - 21:50

BLASPHEMY!!! Any option with pie should be credited to me... not rulen! >.>


I thought I was the one that should be dedicated with the PIEzu option. :P *shock*

Anyway, :P I like the idea, it serves well for people. Gets votes from me, I see no problems at all with this.

#7 Dark Archon

Dark Archon

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,346 posts

Posted 01 June 2008 - 21:52

I can't vote on a thread where pie isn't credited to me >.>

#8 fs_evillove

fs_evillove
  • Guests

Posted 01 June 2008 - 22:06

I can't vote on a thread where pie isn't credited to me >.>


*Rolls eyes* Nyazu~ No PIE for youzu. :P


I think I have to say though Ecol, that I like this better than personal tagging, where you are able to loan out items.

#9 Dark Archon

Dark Archon

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,346 posts

Posted 01 June 2008 - 22:09

I can't vote on a thread where pie isn't credited to me >.>


*Rolls eyes* Nyazu~ No PIE for youzu. :P


I think I have to say though Ecol, that I like this better than personal tagging, where you are able to loan out items.


This is PIE nazi?! :x

#10 fs_rulen

fs_rulen
  • Guests

Posted 02 June 2008 - 04:27

I can't vote on a thread where pie isn't credited to me >.>


LOL Ecolitan has spoken

credited to me!!!! oh by the way

BUMP check out this great idea.

#11 fs_ecolitan

fs_ecolitan
  • Guests

Posted 03 June 2008 - 19:51

Cake is always a lie. And I didn't attribute the pie to Rulen just knew he'd choose it (or had a good guess he would). DA, had no clue where you'd come down though. Wouldn't have wanted to make you choose between pie and honesty.

#12 fs_rulen

fs_rulen
  • Guests

Posted 04 June 2008 - 05:11

you know Ecolitan I may have said yes if the Pie option didn't have my name in it LOL.

anyway everyone this is a great idea. I'd like to know why you all are against it as well

#13 fs_ecolitan

fs_ecolitan
  • Guests

Posted 06 June 2008 - 14:52

prod

#14 fs_ecolitan

fs_ecolitan
  • Guests

Posted 11 June 2008 - 14:57

basically
upwardly
moving
post

#15 fs_sleepsalot

fs_sleepsalot
  • Guests

Posted 11 June 2008 - 20:44

Woted yes I have seen where in the past when the servers were much slower I did click the wrong item and droped a FF Henz shield not the crap Item I wanted to so I think we sould be able to mark a item say at the gold rate used by Guild tagging for doing it 100 gold per level

#16 fs_ecolitan

fs_ecolitan
  • Guests

Posted 12 June 2008 - 04:10

I had in mind a lower fee since it benefits fewer people. My idea was 50 gold per level of the item, but even at 100 I'd do it for lots of items.

#17 fs_ecolitan

fs_ecolitan
  • Guests

Posted 17 June 2008 - 18:05

bump - bump

#18 fs_ecolitan

fs_ecolitan
  • Guests

Posted 24 June 2008 - 18:53

Bump since nobody looked at anything but the arena for last week or more.

#19 fs_ecolitan

fs_ecolitan
  • Guests

Posted 30 June 2008 - 16:33

Seen a couple somewhat similar threads, and still no cowment.

#20 RebornJedi

RebornJedi

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5,449 posts

Posted 08 May 2009 - 02:37

i would love the option to tag personal items so i wont auction, drop, or give them away. could make it a personal upgrade to tag/untag items-maybe just make it so everyone starts with this option. tagging should have a gold cost compared to the item's level *thumbs up*

maybe make it possible to tag potions so you cant drink them till you untag them :)

*i know this is a distant bump yet its the closest suggestion of this type. i dont like the idea of tagging and renting out, just tagging to have some security behind my items.

 



2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users

Font:
Arial | Calibri | Lucida Console | Verdana
 
Font Size:
9px | 10px | 11px | 12px | 10pt | 12pt
 
Color: