Jump to content

Set Bonus~~Damage to equipment


  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

Poll: Eliminate set bonuses for fully damaged equipment? (39 member(s) have cast votes)

Eliminate set bonuses for fully damaged equipment?

  1. Yes (39 votes [86.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 86.67%

  2. No (6 votes [13.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 13.33%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 fs_navre

fs_navre
  • Guests

Posted 25 August 2008 - 14:52

I apologize f this has been mentioned before. I did a search on "Set Bonuses" and didn't see it.

I think that when any piece of a set is down to zero durability, you should lose the set bonuses for that set.

I recently saw someone on the bounty board whose Golden Cockatrice set was all down to zero durability, yet he still had the set bonuses.

If my destroyer sword is at 0, should I still be getting the 2000 damage for the set bonus??


Discuss, flame, tell me where I'm wrong, tell me I'm brilliant and should be hired to run the Cows North American Division, etc... :)

#2 fs_navre

fs_navre
  • Guests

Posted 25 August 2008 - 14:55

Added a poll

(I know, there are too many polls :oops: )

#3 ScarletTestAce

ScarletTestAce

    Member

  • New Members
  • PipPip
  • 465 posts

Posted 25 August 2008 - 15:42

I think its a good idea.

#4 fs_thristle

fs_thristle
  • Guests

Posted 25 August 2008 - 16:06

yeah, we should...i mean...they need to be in good condition to work together to get the set bonuses, right?

#5 DarthViper

DarthViper

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,425 posts

Posted 25 August 2008 - 16:13

Very rarely does a set reach 0 durability, but I voed yes anyways, because its a good concept.

Did you know that there are likely over 2000 rouge black holes in our galaxy alone. Each of them can reach very high speeds, even in space terms, are each capable of destroying anything in their path, and are invisible. Well, goodnight!


#6 fs_nthnclls

fs_nthnclls
  • Guests

Posted 25 August 2008 - 16:16

Makes sense.

#7 doa4life

doa4life

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,737 posts
  • Badge

Posted 25 August 2008 - 16:32

Thumbs up from Me!

#8 fs_ecolitan

fs_ecolitan
  • Guests

Posted 25 August 2008 - 16:34

I agree. In particular this HAS to be implemented for spine gear! I remember LONG time ago seeing someone with 0 durability spine equipment still getting set bonus from it.

#9 fs_xeononyx

fs_xeononyx
  • Guests

Posted 25 August 2008 - 16:39

I will also agree, I get a kick out of knocking gear off someone (dropping them below their gear's level) It would also be another cool mission to knock set bonuses off someone by "breaking their set". Disarm FTW!

#10 fs_theloneman

fs_theloneman
  • Guests

Posted 25 August 2008 - 20:30

Yes I like that, and I'd like to destroy all other Maximus/Gurgriss items to prevent stam gain :twisted:

#11 fs_evillove

fs_evillove
  • Guests

Posted 25 August 2008 - 21:33

It does make sense, if the set has no durability, can't see why the bonuses should still exist.

#12 fs_navre

fs_navre
  • Guests

Posted 26 August 2008 - 02:23

Very rarely does a set reach 0 durability, but I voed yes anyways, because its a good concept.


Destroyer pieces have durability of 10. One could go to zero just by clearing a square without repairing. But, for the most part, sets would be zeroed out when someone was on the bounty board.

#13 DarthViper

DarthViper

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,425 posts

Posted 26 August 2008 - 02:25

Very rarely does a set reach 0 durability, but I voed yes anyways, because its a good concept.


Destroyer pieces have durability of 10. One could go to zero just by clearing a square without repairing. But, for the most part, sets would be zeroed out when someone was on the bounty board.


Really? Well then, I guess you have to remember to repair it (or use unbreakable).

Did you know that there are likely over 2000 rouge black holes in our galaxy alone. Each of them can reach very high speeds, even in space terms, are each capable of destroying anything in their path, and are invisible. Well, goodnight!


#14 fs_navre

fs_navre
  • Guests

Posted 22 November 2008 - 16:46

The sum of any two consecutive triangular numbers is a square number.

(Saying BUMP seemed like such a waste)

#15 fs_nikp

fs_nikp
  • Guests

Posted 22 November 2008 - 17:19

Good idea, not really necessary, but I vote yes :)

#16 fs_gracegone

fs_gracegone
  • Guests

Posted 22 November 2008 - 18:11

actually just last night I saw someone get a destroyer set down to 0 durability.. I vote yes because it makes no sense that they still get the bonuses since its like they aren't even wearing the item.

#17 fs_navre

fs_navre
  • Guests

Posted 21 December 2008 - 20:27

Jane Fonda was born this date in 1937.

Joseph Stalin was born this day in 1879.....Coincidence?

(Again, saying BUMP is boring)

#18 fs_navre

fs_navre
  • Guests

Posted 04 January 2009 - 02:02

This just in:

Generalissimo Francisco Franco is still dead.


(and bump)

#19 fs_negrumir

fs_negrumir
  • Guests

Posted 04 January 2009 - 03:29

You have a point.
Broken items should be considered not equipped.

#20 fs_navre

fs_navre
  • Guests

Posted 22 May 2009 - 22:52

The sum of two, consecutive, triangular numbers is always a square number!

(Bump)


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Font:
Arial | Calibri | Lucida Console | Verdana
 
Font Size:
9px | 10px | 11px | 12px | 10pt | 12pt
 
Color: