Jump to content

Shield Imp revamp


  • Please log in to reply
30 replies to this topic

Poll: What would you like? (15 member(s) have cast votes)

What would you like?

  1. Leave Shield Imp as it is, I want the game to be easy and boring :) (10 votes [58.82%])

    Percentage of vote: 58.82%

  2. Make it work against certain classes only (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. Make it a probability buff (2 votes [11.76%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.76%

  4. Make it drain stamina (4 votes [23.53%])

    Percentage of vote: 23.53%

  5. I have a better idea for the buff (post in thread please) (1 votes [5.88%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.88%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 fs_coyotik

fs_coyotik
  • Guests

Posted 27 August 2008 - 11:52

The problem is everyone taking CA at its max value ... we don't need to make it 40% @ 160 ... 25% @ 100 is just fine for me

... 40% more stam is too high ... and i am pretty sure we can 1 hit with 45% more damage thus only 25% more stam ... which would make it better than wither 350 ( as it would be 1.25 per mob )

And now is it bette 12.5 vs 13 :P

or you can make it exactly 13 and save 8fps as you don't have to buy wither potion so another 200 stam for you


I'm sure that stamina consumption is rounded up :). So it's either 12 or 13.

I haven't seen CA in action. Does it work, then, on the doubler-multiplied stamina cost?

CA could be pretty useful skill if we had the ability to decide how strong we want it cast, because in some places I would be happy with just extra 10%.

#22 fs_wanndererr

fs_wanndererr
  • Guests

Posted 27 August 2008 - 11:55

The math is sonmewhere here ... not good name but its

stamina consumption = ceiling ( ( nbr round * doubler multiplier ) * % more stam from CA )

so indeed 12.5 would make 13 ... than make it 13% all the way to 120 :P

But indeed having the choice on the size you want it would be a killer ... why 40% when you need 10

#23 fs_coyotik

fs_coyotik
  • Guests

Posted 27 August 2008 - 12:00

The only other choice would be to form a team of buffers with different levels each.

#24 fs_wanndererr

fs_wanndererr
  • Guests

Posted 27 August 2008 - 12:03

And the one you need would ALWAYS be offline when you need it :P

#25 fs_finite

fs_finite
  • Guests

Posted 27 August 2008 - 12:15

can we make an ajustment so that players under level 400 cannot use it, that way it is avalable to everyone not just those who can afford it, i would like to see this happen to all the buffs which making leveling easier and quicker...

then those above level 400 cannot sell it for profit to lower levels but leveling is easier...

#26 fs_karigulus

fs_karigulus
  • Guests

Posted 27 August 2008 - 12:18

can we make an ajustment so that players under level 400 cannot use it, that way it is avalable to everyone not just those who can afford it, i would like to see this happen to all the buffs which making leveling easier and quicker...

then those above level 400 cannot sell it for profit to lower levels but leveling is easier...


Players under level 400 cannot use it? that way it is available to everyone? Im confused :?

#27 fs_coyotik

fs_coyotik
  • Guests

Posted 27 August 2008 - 13:06

can we make an ajustment so that players under level 400 cannot use it, that way it is avalable to everyone not just those who can afford it, i would like to see this happen to all the buffs which making leveling easier and quicker...

then those above level 400 cannot sell it for profit to lower levels but leveling is easier...


Players under level 400 cannot use it? that way it is available to everyone? Im confused :?


I would much prefer "guild-only" buffs than level-based restrictions.

#28 fs_ecofrog

fs_ecofrog
  • Guests

Posted 27 August 2008 - 14:02

the trouble with the buff is it destroyes PvP and relic defense capture.... that should change

#29 fs_coyotik

fs_coyotik
  • Guests

Posted 27 August 2008 - 14:13

PvM only would be the best solution (and I would also vote for excluding ANY non-regular monsters (champions, elites or at least SE)

#30 fs_tawniteamo

fs_tawniteamo
  • Guests

Posted 27 August 2008 - 14:16

PvM only would be the best solution (and I would also vote for excluding ANY non-regular monsters (champions, elites or at least SE)


yes please ^^

#31 fs_vitz

fs_vitz
  • Guests

Posted 27 August 2008 - 14:47

PvM only would be the best solution (and I would also vote for excluding ANY non-regular monsters (champions, elites or at least SE)


yes please ^^


Seriously, it makes you invincible in PvP


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Font:
Arial | Calibri | Lucida Console | Verdana
 
Font Size:
9px | 10px | 11px | 12px | 10pt | 12pt
 
Color: