Jump to content

Evolutions:Beating on a retired player to win a GVG conflict


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
7 replies to this topic

#1 fs_narex

fs_narex
  • Guests

Posted 04 May 2009 - 14:01

That's correct folks. The walking, talking POS harbored by the guild Evolutions initiated a conflict with us. Why is this repulsive? None of my members report being hit. So I look at this degenerate's level and see that the ONLY member of my guild who he can possibly attack is our unarmed former founder, seath. Wow, what an impressive win. I hope you all choke on it.

#2 fs_dikkedwerg

fs_dikkedwerg
  • Guests

Posted 04 May 2009 - 14:07

isn't the whole idea of GvG hitting retired members so you
know for sure you get the 50/50? :roll:

#3 fs_narex

fs_narex
  • Guests

Posted 04 May 2009 - 14:13

I've heard of such underhanded play, and it always disgusted me. But hitting a naked, retired player is a new low hence this thread.

#4 nosympathy

nosympathy

    Member

  • New Members
  • PipPip
  • 156 posts

Posted 04 May 2009 - 14:15

That's low..

#5 boeffie

boeffie

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 977 posts

Posted 04 May 2009 - 15:20

I agree it isn't the most accomplished way of hitting people,

However, I might point out that at the time of initiating this, we also had a player who was completely without kit, also, it in no way stops you getting your 50 hits in, as your range is large, and you have some good PvPers.

I might also point out that your player does point out in his bio he is wearing some good boots :D

I personally wouldn't ever think of going inactive without being fully clothed, but maybe my boots aren't in the same league either, they just have pointy heels
:lol:

#6 fs_dikkedwerg

fs_dikkedwerg
  • Guests

Posted 04 May 2009 - 16:41

I agree it isn't the most accomplished way of hitting people,

However, I might point out that at the time of initiating this, we also had a player who was completely without kit, also, it in no way stops you getting your 50 hits in, as your range is large, and you have some good PvPers.

I might also point out that your player does point out in his bio he is wearing some good boots :D

I personally wouldn't ever think of going inactive without being fully clothed, but maybe my boots aren't in the same league either, they just have pointy heels
:lol:


well, I don't think it matters what an inactive player wears, it stays
low to attack such people, especially in GvG. Phool got attacked one
day after his retirement...it wouldn't make someone better, if Phool
was fully dressed...

#7 Yuuzhan

Yuuzhan

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 355 posts
  • Badge
  • Canada

Posted 04 May 2009 - 18:22

i ask this then: what is the difference between attacking an inactive person, or a person who is offline and unable to defend themselves?

any kit can be beaten, and if your target is offline, they are just as good as being naked.

#8 fs_mrwright

fs_mrwright
  • Guests

Posted 04 May 2009 - 18:25

Wah freakin' wah...

Boo flippin' hoo...

Cry me a river. For cryin' out loud, you hold a guildmate position for someone who is going to be a liability to you.

And you knew he would be every day you kept him in the guild.

And if taking advantage of that makes me a POS, then so be it. I proudly accept the title.

You call me a degenerate?

Then I got 2 words for ya....
















In Your Face.


I guess that's 3 words. Ah well.


2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users

Font:
Arial | Calibri | Lucida Console | Verdana
 
Font Size:
9px | 10px | 11px | 12px | 10pt | 12pt
 
Color: