pvp change
#21
fs_chessblade
Posted 03 July 2009 - 16:05
At the end of the day I'll have used ~130 stam per targets vs a 100 stammers ~ 400 stam prolly and I may have a better take and more people hit
#22
Posted 03 July 2009 - 21:17
Your only level 41 though, no offense, my idea was gernerally geared to bring life back to PvP for all above lv300. Most PvP is done at the lower levels because of the ease of losing 5 levels for a 10 stamina attack past LV300.I hit with 10 stam instead of 100 unless I am in a hurry sometimes I'll do that and hit every hour. MasterThief kicks in within 13 hits normally so I could get all of someones gold and lose 1 level max. Most people I hit right after they log off so that gives me 8 hits till many notice
At the end of the day I'll have used ~130 stam per targets vs a 100 stammers ~ 400 stam prolly and I may have a better take and more people hit
#23
Posted 04 July 2009 - 03:14
#24
Posted 04 July 2009 - 13:33
For the higher levels it isnt about the gold, I personally could care less about my gold being stolen, I can make it back in a few stam, however If I want to PvP I lose 5 levels if just a 10 stamina attack, That is too hard to gain back considering the ease of losing it.i dont really like the idea of making a ratio between stam and levels loss.... master thief can kick in on a 10 stam.
#25
fs_anaiis
Posted 04 July 2009 - 22:45
For the higher levels it isnt about the gold
Speak for yourself
#26
Posted 04 July 2009 - 23:24
For the higher levels it isnt about the gold
Speak for yourself
I like stealing gold but taking exp is sometimes more fun due to the comments.
#27
fs_anaiis
Posted 04 July 2009 - 23:35
ETA: why did p*** get automatically changed to tinkle? :?
#28
Posted 05 July 2009 - 02:17
#29
Posted 07 July 2009 - 13:12
#30
Posted 07 July 2009 - 13:30
#31
Posted 07 July 2009 - 13:58
#32
Posted 07 July 2009 - 14:00
#33
fs_khalsa500
Posted 10 July 2009 - 14:31
#34
fs_khalsa500
Posted 13 July 2009 - 15:07
#35
fs_khalsa500
Posted 18 July 2009 - 00:06
#36
fs_tal6727
Posted 18 July 2009 - 00:32
#37
fs_khalsa500
Posted 22 July 2009 - 02:20
#38
fs_khalsa500
Posted 26 July 2009 - 13:24
#39
fs_khalsa500
Posted 25 August 2009 - 13:46
#40
fs_skig
Posted 25 August 2009 - 14:05
Limiting level loss proportionate to the stam used would also help fix the xp loss the higher levels suffer from being on the bb.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

