EPIC ITEM For Alliegence Tokens
#21
Posted 11 March 2010 - 15:07
#22
Posted 12 March 2010 - 08:37
#23
fs_stickisgod
Posted 12 March 2010 - 08:38
I'm down with this. I have stuff in my BP just because it looks awesome. Hell, I have a pistol in my BP.I wouldnt go as far as putting some overpowered epic item in for Tokens, but some well designed good looking item/set maybe? Nothing too powerful, just that it will look good and maybe have something like a +1 stam gain, or some little xp gain possibly. As long as it looks cooooooool.
#24
Posted 12 March 2010 - 08:40
I'm down with this. I have stuff in my BP just because it looks awesome. Hell, I have a pistol in my BP.I wouldnt go as far as putting some overpowered epic item in for Tokens, but some well designed good looking item/set maybe? Nothing too powerful, just that it will look good and maybe have something like a +1 stam gain, or some little xp gain possibly. As long as it looks cooooooool.
Somehow I knew you would agree :wink:
#25
fs_stickisgod
Posted 12 March 2010 - 08:41
What can I say? I like bling.I'm down with this. I have stuff in my BP just because it looks awesome. Hell, I have a pistol in my BP.I wouldnt go as far as putting some overpowered epic item in for Tokens, but some well designed good looking item/set maybe? Nothing too powerful, just that it will look good and maybe have something like a +1 stam gain, or some little xp gain possibly. As long as it looks cooooooool.
Somehow I knew you would agree :wink:
#26
fs_mudgezbt
Posted 12 March 2010 - 21:43
#27
fs_kirst
Posted 12 March 2010 - 22:16
I would love to see the ability to get over +90 stam gain with upgrades paid by tokens
Somehow I imagine it would cost some insane amount of AP to get a +1 stam gain. :x
#28
Posted 13 March 2010 - 15:33
#29
fs_philip333
Posted 13 March 2010 - 16:17
#30
Posted 14 March 2010 - 00:39
I would love to see the ability to get over +90 stam gain with upgrades paid by tokens
Somehow I imagine it would cost some insane amount of AP to get a +1 stam gain. :x
that would be perfectly reasonable in my view
#31
fs_kondom25
Posted 14 March 2010 - 01:08
reason many player out there can purchase fsp without being donator
(by participate => Fallen Sword Point Rewards) they can get free fsp than donator can get
pls consider the donator support the games with real money not free like non donator player
or deleted Alliegence Tokens
change it with more profit to the donator :
*more stam gain/hour
*reduce time gain to 45 minutes or 30 minutes
*if there's an epic item => should be different from current epic (special donator epic)
if Alliegence Tokens change into the potion & non donator can get it too
(nothing special for donator who help support the game)
#32
Posted 14 March 2010 - 01:19
#33
Posted 14 March 2010 - 02:59
what he said its make sense.. must diffrent between donators and non donators
i'm have 48.000 AT to buy now with that big AT now i'm confuse
must i'm spent my AT to buy double 1200 ??
put some EPIC ITEM at Loyality AT not only Potion
by,
karinajaya
#34
Posted 14 March 2010 - 03:16
Crystal Epics?
that would be entertaining
#35
Posted 14 March 2010 - 03:20
I disagree.i'm agree with mr kondom25
what he said its make sense.. must diffrent between donators and non donators
i'm have 48.000 AT to buy now with that big AT now i'm confuse
must i'm spent my AT to buy double 1200 ??
put some EPIC ITEM at Loyality AT not only Potion
by,
karinajaya
The big problem with what you ask for is any Epic item would need to be bound. I don't know of a single item besides some quest items that are bound. This only forces players to do the quest instead of buying the item to do the quest.
Also, you would create a new source of income for donators who have already received FSP and now AT potion rewards. It would begin a division between those that donate and those that don't, something I believe HCS will avoid. Everything in game must be accessible to all players.
AT rewards should not become a source of getting Epic gear. Use your donation FSP to buy Epic gear from players that can manage to get them. They aren't needed to play, just wanted...
[Signature removed]
“When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say.” -GRRM
#36
Posted 14 March 2010 - 03:38
#37
Posted 14 March 2010 - 03:45
I disagree.i'm agree with mr kondom25
what he said its make sense.. must diffrent between donators and non donators
i'm have 48.000 AT to buy now with that big AT now i'm confuse
must i'm spent my AT to buy double 1200 ??
put some EPIC ITEM at Loyality AT not only Potion
by,
karinajaya
The big problem with what you ask for is any Epic item would need to be bound. I don't know of a single item besides some quest items that are bound. This only forces players to do the quest instead of buying the item to do the quest.
Also, you would create a new source of income for donators who have already received FSP and now AT potion rewards. It would begin a division between those that donate and those that don't, something I believe HCS will avoid. Everything in game must be accessible to all players.
AT rewards should not become a source of getting Epic gear. Use your donation FSP to buy Epic gear from players that can manage to get them. They aren't needed to play, just wanted...
Now I disagree.
First it probably should be bound and if it is bound I don't see it as a problem. Obviously if it is bound there would be no new source of income.
If it isn't bound it would indeed create a new source of income for people able to use AT to buy the epic but why are you worried about the division it would create? After all, there is a division now between the few guilds who can get titan epics and everyone else. Seems to me to be the same thing. Having both ways to get epics (and a third via GvG and RP) just makes sense to me as it differentiates the approaches people can use to their goals. The more ways there are for people to reach their goals - like getting an epic - is a good way to generate more interest in the game and likely to encourage more donations.
Why should people be forced to donate in order to get epics but not be able to use the fact that they donated to help them to get the epics themselves. That doesn't logically compute to me.
#38
fs_philip333
Posted 14 March 2010 - 05:47
#39
Posted 14 March 2010 - 06:40
people the word is not donator but donor. Please?
Exactly, just the whole point of this thread :|
No, no epics. Nothing powerful, nothing that will give donators and edge. Just something that looks cool, a piece that says "Hey I donate, I got this cool loking switchblade or whatever out of it. And you didnt get one." If you have to put some gain in it, let it be +1 xp or +1 gold, something useless and funny.
#40
Posted 14 March 2010 - 07:52
people the word is not donator but donor. Please?
Exactly, just the whole point of this thread :|
No, no epics. Nothing powerful, nothing that will give donators and edge. Just something that looks cool, a piece that says "Hey I donate, I got this cool loking switchblade or whatever out of it. And you didnt get one." If you have to put some gain in it, let it be +1 xp or +1 gold, something useless and funny.
Perhaps not the whole point of the thread but then if you want to actually make a point and have it understood, it is generally a good idea to use language that means what you want to say.
I don't see why donors shouldn't get an edge when it is currently OK for the biggest guild(s) or the smallest GvG "guilds" to get an edge in epic gathering. (What is "and" edge anyway?)
No doubt you have a reason why one is OK and the other isn't; it is a shame you didn't feel like sharing it with the rest of us.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



