Jump to content

TRADES


  • Please log in to reply
30 replies to this topic

#21 fs_wellrest

fs_wellrest
  • Guests

Posted 19 March 2010 - 19:50

I personally think this would be very helpful. But if you really think about it, HCS makes a lot of money out of players that get addicted to this game. I've heard people spend up to $20,000 u.s dollars on this stupid game. Those kinda people, are the kind of people that HCS pays attention to. not us, the ones that make money out of the BB, trading , Hunting, Etc..

Come on HCS, your thirst for money is making this game POOP.

#22 Reddstarr

Reddstarr

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 280 posts

Posted 19 March 2010 - 21:34

I agree completly wouldnt this Theivery be like a Customer Support thing? I also got a topic about this in poll form as well =D

#23 fs_sollimaw

fs_sollimaw
  • Guests

Posted 19 March 2010 - 21:51

1. Step : Player 1/Player 2 offer Item, Gold, FSP
2. Step : Accept ( not trading yet )
3. Step : Player 2/Player 1 offer Item, Gold, FSP
4. Step : Accept ( not trading yet )
5. Step : Player 1 + Player 2 see what they are trading ( Item/Item, Item/FSP, Gold/FSP etc..)
6. Step : Player 1 TRADE
7. Step : Player 2 TRADE
8. Step : Both players happy.


To being able to send an indirect trade seems not good to me, since that way players are able to
see your inventory.


Just as is done in other games. Secure and easy.

#24 fs_dougmines

fs_dougmines
  • Guests

Posted 20 March 2010 - 02:28

I say if you have proof that a theft has occurred and they can easily check those facts, then they should immediately straighten it and kick the thief forever, to not do so would say this sort of thing is okay

#25 Asahara

Asahara

    Veteran

  • New Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 879 posts

Posted 20 March 2010 - 02:47

I say if you have proof that a theft has occurred and they can easily check those facts, then they should immediately straighten it and kick the thief forever, to not do so would say this sort of thing is okay


And yet they look the other way anyway.

#26 fs_hyoniin

fs_hyoniin
  • Guests

Posted 20 March 2010 - 02:50

I agree with those here proposing the idea to add in some extra steps to the ST service where player 1 offers a trade for item X and maybe has a box where they can add text indicating what they wish to receive in return for the trade (i.e. I offer a writhing ward to player 2 and in the box indicate that I would like 750 FSP and the elemental earth hammer). Player 2 receives the ST and reads the post with it and thinks that it is a fair deal and chooses to offer 750 FSP and the hammer. Then an acceptance message is sent back to player 1 (me) letting me choose to accept the offer or decline. Likewise, player 2 may think that my request is not accurate to the trade and wants to instead offer 500 FSP and the hammer. He then has the ability to offer that payment in return for the ward rather than simply decline the trade outright.

I feel that an update like this would be much more like a real trade experience where things are negotiated a little more. It would allow for the trading of items for items in a safe manner without exposing what is in someone's inventory. Additionally, it would allow the option for a little more negotiation within the trade rather than just offering up X item/FSP/gold for a declared amount of FSP/gold in return.

Additionally this would provide plenty of security in trades while not adding many additional "labors" It wouldn't require require some sort of acceptance message on both sides because player 1's trade offer is locked in once submitted and can't be changed without sending a new trade request so there wouldn't be any risk of last minute changes.

I am in support of that although I dont trade items for items. I have seen a lot of ripp offs going on & people not paying back for these. HCS should consider this seriously


A lot of people don't currently trade items for items merely because of the high risk of it, however, if an improved Secure trade system is implemented then this would likely change to promote more item trading.

#27 manreece

manreece

    New Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 16 posts

Posted 20 March 2010 - 10:07

I agree with this also .. i have heard of many getting scammed this way so anything to help with this would be great
:D

#28 rebtex

rebtex

    Veteran

  • New Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,487 posts
  • United States of America

Posted 24 March 2010 - 00:20

Lets BUMP this back to the front page players need to discuss this! :shock:

alonesig_lafuria-1.png


#29 fs_theoryman

fs_theoryman
  • Guests

Posted 24 March 2010 - 01:41

Under " In return I require...", have an area where you can add items, that they are auctioning and currently have no bids, to the ST; increase the minimum bid in the AH to 10,000.

#30 rebtex

rebtex

    Veteran

  • New Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,487 posts
  • United States of America

Posted 02 July 2010 - 03:58

Bumbedy, bump bump.

alonesig_lafuria-1.png


#31 skepsis

skepsis

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 264 posts

Posted 03 July 2010 - 00:04

i have never made an item for item exchange before. and who would be dumb enough to send first.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Font:
Arial | Calibri | Lucida Console | Verdana
 
Font Size:
9px | 10px | 11px | 12px | 10pt | 12pt
 
Color: