Before anything, me apology for me english.
Dont know about U, but I think its not fair to see 1 attacker able to take a relic defended by 20 defenders.
Attackers should be stronger than defenders, not only doing a group but effectively being on the spot where the relic is.
We could see real troops raiding unexpected to take the relics as in real wars.
Ennemis guild could ruin efforts of opponents by taking their relic as long as they have a group strong enough on spot and no only one hunter
Then if they want to keep it, stay in it as long as they can afford.
That would not change the game but would give more interrest as guilds would have to be well organised to gain relics and relics could be counter attacked same way.
Its just me opinion but I wanted to share it.
relics defense and attack
Started by
fs_jaubernien
, Mar 28 2010 19:28
1 reply to this topic
#1
fs_jaubernien
Posted 28 March 2010 - 19:28
#2
Posted 29 March 2010 - 13:59
The relic isn't taken by one player. It's taken with a group. Much like the fact that no matter how many players you have sitting on the relic, it's still the lead defender that's the main defender. All the others contribute a portion of their stats to the lead defender, the same as in a group attack.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

