Jump to content

Photo

Who kicked whom?


  • Please log in to reply
84 replies to this topic

Poll: Should the name of the player that kicks someone appear in the guild logs again? (175 member(s) have cast votes)

Should the name of the player that kicks someone appear in the guild logs again?

  1. Voted Yes, please put it back I want to know who kicked them. (171 votes [93.96%])

    Percentage of vote: 93.96%

  2. Voted No, it's enough to just know they were kicked. (11 votes [6.04%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.04%

  3. Other, I'll post my comments in the thread. (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 boeffie

boeffie

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 977 posts

Posted 07 April 2010 - 00:20

Don't know why it was removed, but I'd like it back. I'm confused as to how someone would be having a legal problem, the kicker or the person who was kicked?

:

#22 evilbry

evilbry

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,172 posts
  • New Zealand

Posted 07 April 2010 - 00:29

They should remove the name from being displayed when you are attacked by another player, I find this a breach of privacy also.

#23 shdowdrgn

shdowdrgn

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 633 posts

Posted 07 April 2010 - 00:30

I will mention it to the coders, it could be a legal reason why we cant name who kicked who, but ill check for you.


31 days.


Give it another year or so and they might get back to you :lol:



Its really looking like it =/

#24 fs_kirst

fs_kirst
  • Guests

Posted 07 April 2010 - 02:54

+1

Bring it back.

#25 BandLaw

BandLaw

    Veteran

  • New Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 799 posts

Posted 07 April 2010 - 03:16

There should be no legal problems whatsover with this... if that is a legal problem, then there's a lot more legal problems in the game, although I'm no expert in UK law.

Nothing that a clarification about expectation of privacy in guild and game logs in the TOS can't help alleviate. You play the game, you assent to the terms.

Bring this back!

#26 fs_arieh

fs_arieh
  • Guests

Posted 07 April 2010 - 04:26

couldn't agree more. i don't know why they changed this either.

#27 fs_arieh

fs_arieh
  • Guests

Posted 07 April 2010 - 04:27

They should remove the name from being displayed when you are attacked by another player, I find this a breach of privacy also.


might as well while they're at it lmao

#28 fs_kirst

fs_kirst
  • Guests

Posted 07 April 2010 - 04:52

I wonder's the guy who voted no? :|

#29 tharzill

tharzill

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 728 posts

Posted 07 April 2010 - 05:18

Bring it back!

#30 sweetlou

sweetlou

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,955 posts

Posted 07 April 2010 - 05:20

What's most interesting to me is the double standard that we need to decide as a community to have it replaced how ever it wasn't decided as a community to remove it. I'm interested in the catalyst that got it removed in the first place. To be honest I felt my support ticket would be return with a "oops we'll fix that". I was kind of shocked to see that I was making a suggestion, as it was deemed, instead of pointing out an error.

I'll agree that even though it is a seemingly minor thing that they changed, I'm curious why they did it as well? There are SO MANY other things that could be looked at to improve the game's quality productively. This isn't one change that makes any sense to me. I'd want to know who kicked who. The other members would know who was responsible and ask why if they wanted. It's only the guild members who would know not the whole FS community. Stick it back to the way it was please but foremost let's see some quality improvements to the existing game. I'm tired of seeing new shiny aspects of play while disregarding things that need to be tweaked.

Here are just a few recent examples:
[*:3s9bx603]GvG
[*:3s9bx603]xp loss at ALL levels
[*:3s9bx603]The Dominance medal and PvP point trading
In all fairness the team has accomplished a few tweaks recently, not all perfect fixes but generally good steps in the right direction:
[*:3s9bx603]Prestige
[*:3s9bx603]SE medal farming
[*:3s9bx603]Spellbreaker buff
[*:3s9bx603]Relics- I reluctantly add this here but think they are still WAY overpowered and need to have the cost of empowering adjusted according to the size of the guild. I can handle it but refuse to jump to a big guild for this reason alone.
[*:3s9bx603]Arena- Still a work in progress but greatly improved.
I am always wondering with the first list why it has taken so long to even begin to look at these issues? They are not new to the game. How long must the issues be discussed? Some of these things have been a problem for years! How many threads do we get to see and reiterate what has already been said over and over?

Btw I know I missed a few lol

[Signature removed]

 

“When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say.” -GRRM


#31 abhorrence

abhorrence

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,191 posts

Posted 07 April 2010 - 17:44

Keep voting everyone one please!

#32 lostviking

lostviking
  • Guests

Posted 07 April 2010 - 20:52

Keep voting everyone one please!


Also if you vote no, please have the courage to voice why you voted against it.

#33 Hoofmaster

Hoofmaster

    Company Director

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPip
  • 8,357 posts
  • Badge
  • United Kingdom

Posted 07 April 2010 - 21:24

I don't remember this being changed to be honest, but I can't see a reason why it would have been. I'll take a look tomorrow in the code :)

#34 lostviking

lostviking
  • Guests

Posted 07 April 2010 - 21:26

I don't remember this being changed to be honest, but I can't see a reason why it would have been. I'll take a look tomorrow in the code :)


Is that real time tomorrow or cow time tomorrow, which translates to about a week or so real time?

#35 Roan

Roan

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 6,278 posts
  • Badge

Posted 07 April 2010 - 21:33

I don't remember this being changed to be honest, but I can't see a reason why it would have been. I'll take a look tomorrow in the code :)


Is that real time tomorrow or cow time tomorrow, which translates to about a week or so real time?

Usually for smaller coding stuff like this, Hoof is okay with the time :D

Firesinged_zpsd6b00c6e.png


#36 fs_regnier7

fs_regnier7
  • Guests

Posted 07 April 2010 - 23:07

I don't remember this being changed to be honest, but I can't see a reason why it would have been. I'll take a look tomorrow in the code :)


Is that real time tomorrow or cow time tomorrow, which translates to about a week or so real time?

Usually for smaller coding stuff like this, Hoof is okay with the time :D



I'll have to get inqognitor to test it out on someone.... ehe

#37 Roan

Roan

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 6,278 posts
  • Badge

Posted 07 April 2010 - 23:20

Rofl reg! :lol:

Firesinged_zpsd6b00c6e.png


#38 fs_babykelz

fs_babykelz
  • Guests

Posted 08 April 2010 - 00:33

Rofl reg! :lol:

its scary cause he can sell snow to a eskimo ;)

#39 fs_imetalusi

fs_imetalusi
  • Guests

Posted 08 April 2010 - 00:42

They should remove the name from being displayed when you are attacked by another player, I find this a breach of privacy also.



HAHAHAHAHA Here Here!!

LOL on Topic yes it needs to be brought back.

*Opps should have read the whole thread lol looks like HCS is on it.*

#40 bulseye71

bulseye71

    Member

  • New Members
  • PipPip
  • 249 posts
  • Badge
  • United States of America

Posted 08 April 2010 - 01:37

it always used to say both names of course...seems it would be a glitch that it no longer does....BUT then they uses the words "re implement " in their reply...so thats odd...I totally support the names being included in the logs message


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Font:
Arial | Calibri | Lucida Console | Verdana
 
Font Size:
9px | 10px | 11px | 12px | 10pt | 12pt
 
Color: