GVG Rating with guilds without 4 members.
#21
Posted 07 June 2010 - 15:14
#22
Posted 18 June 2010 - 12:01
Ok so this is kinda annoying-I'm going through GvG ladder to see which guilds have members around my range--and there are just to many guilds with 1 member or with inactive members...they shouldn't be there if they are not actively GvG-ing...ok some of them worked hard to get there-but they are doing nothing now-and they don't deserve to be on top anymore..but that's just my opinion...
#23
Posted 28 June 2010 - 23:30
Guilds with banned members,1-3 player guilds,guilds with inactive members,guilds with only 1-2 active members,guilds that constantly kick-and re-invite some of their members...Yeap,they surely deserve to be on GvG lader(who cares if they were good GvG in the past-they are not anymore)...
But then again-only few top GvG guilds actually care for their rating -so why should this be fixed...
#24
Posted 28 June 2010 - 23:41
Perhaps more guilds would care about their rating should this be fixedBut then again-only few top GvG guilds actually care for their rating -so why should this be fixed...
#25
fs_littlejom
Posted 29 June 2010 - 00:11
Their limits should not decay, however when not considered a top guild in either category they should simply turn invisible on the list.
#26
Posted 29 June 2010 - 00:14
Its really not the the same though, the only reason this is different, is because guild who obtain their gvg rating and fall under the amount need to partake are immune from losing any once whatever conflicts they have started/started against them ends. Any other scoreboard, including regul;ar pvp rating, they are still viable targets.Similar to the top 250 guilds which have locked xp at 1 billion (for eg.) yet only have 5k true xp.
Their limits should not decay, however when not considered a top guild in either category they should simply turn invisible on the list.
#27
fs_littlejom
Posted 29 June 2010 - 00:20
Its really not the the same though, the only reason this is different, is because guild who obtain their gvg rating and fall under the amount need to partake are immune from losing any once whatever conflicts they have started/started against them ends. Any other scoreboard, including regul;ar pvp rating, they are still viable targets.Similar to the top 250 guilds which have locked xp at 1 billion (for eg.) yet only have 5k true xp.
Their limits should not decay, however when not considered a top guild in either category they should simply turn invisible on the list.
My point here was people who may look for guilds on the top 250 list will find these empty dead guilds, most likely held by multis just because of the fsp invested in them. Similar in the sense that it wastes peoples time and gets their hope up for no reason.
#28
Posted 29 June 2010 - 00:25
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

