Jump to content

Photo

GVG Rating with guilds without 4 members.


  • Please log in to reply
27 replies to this topic

#21 kingtyrin

kingtyrin

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,700 posts

Posted 07 June 2010 - 15:14

*bumps while BigGrim is here*

#22 Anemie

Anemie

    Veteran

  • New Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 633 posts

Posted 18 June 2010 - 12:01

bump?

Ok so this is kinda annoying-I'm going through GvG ladder to see which guilds have members around my range--and there are just to many guilds with 1 member or with inactive members...they shouldn't be there if they are not actively GvG-ing...ok some of them worked hard to get there-but they are doing nothing now-and they don't deserve to be on top anymore..but that's just my opinion...

#23 Anemie

Anemie

    Veteran

  • New Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 633 posts

Posted 28 June 2010 - 23:30

Still nothing :(

Guilds with banned members,1-3 player guilds,guilds with inactive members,guilds with only 1-2 active members,guilds that constantly kick-and re-invite some of their members...Yeap,they surely deserve to be on GvG lader(who cares if they were good GvG in the past-they are not anymore)...
But then again-only few top GvG guilds actually care for their rating -so why should this be fixed... :(

#24 kingtyrin

kingtyrin

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,700 posts

Posted 28 June 2010 - 23:41

But then again-only few top GvG guilds actually care for their rating -so why should this be fixed... :(

Perhaps more guilds would care about their rating should this be fixed :) (Thanks for the bumping)

#25 fs_littlejom

fs_littlejom
  • Guests

Posted 29 June 2010 - 00:11

Similar to the top 250 guilds which have locked xp at 1 billion (for eg.) yet only have 5k true xp.

Their limits should not decay, however when not considered a top guild in either category they should simply turn invisible on the list.

#26 kingtyrin

kingtyrin

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,700 posts

Posted 29 June 2010 - 00:14

Similar to the top 250 guilds which have locked xp at 1 billion (for eg.) yet only have 5k true xp.

Their limits should not decay, however when not considered a top guild in either category they should simply turn invisible on the list.

Its really not the the same though, the only reason this is different, is because guild who obtain their gvg rating and fall under the amount need to partake are immune from losing any once whatever conflicts they have started/started against them ends. Any other scoreboard, including regul;ar pvp rating, they are still viable targets.

#27 fs_littlejom

fs_littlejom
  • Guests

Posted 29 June 2010 - 00:20

Similar to the top 250 guilds which have locked xp at 1 billion (for eg.) yet only have 5k true xp.

Their limits should not decay, however when not considered a top guild in either category they should simply turn invisible on the list.

Its really not the the same though, the only reason this is different, is because guild who obtain their gvg rating and fall under the amount need to partake are immune from losing any once whatever conflicts they have started/started against them ends. Any other scoreboard, including regul;ar pvp rating, they are still viable targets.


My point here was people who may look for guilds on the top 250 list will find these empty dead guilds, most likely held by multis just because of the fsp invested in them. Similar in the sense that it wastes peoples time and gets their hope up for no reason.

#28 kingtyrin

kingtyrin

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,700 posts

Posted 29 June 2010 - 00:25

Fair enough.


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

Font:
Arial | Calibri | Lucida Console | Verdana
 
Font Size:
9px | 10px | 11px | 12px | 10pt | 12pt
 
Color: