Jump to content

Photo

GvG Target Range Change


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 volcom

volcom

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 236 posts
  • Badge

Posted 29 July 2010 - 17:25

Hi guys i wanted to suggest that we change to gvg target range from +/- 25 to +/_ 35 or something but i think it should be changed what do u all think???

also selling this avi right now its at this url
http://www.photoshop... ... 54e2c3e300
buy now 7 fsp min bid 1 fsp will be sold to highest bidder tomorrow :D

#2 Kayesha

Kayesha

    Veteran

  • New Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,030 posts
  • United States of America

Posted 29 July 2010 - 17:34

No, I think +/-25 gives people a 50 level range. That is more than enough range to find targets within your level

#3 fs_gandel75

fs_gandel75
  • Guests

Posted 29 July 2010 - 17:35

No, I think +/-25 gives people a 50 level range. That is more than enough range to find targets within your level



i agree

#4 volcom

volcom

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 236 posts
  • Badge

Posted 29 July 2010 - 17:35

No, I think +/-25 gives people a 50 level range. That is more than enough range to find targets within your level


but why not?

#5 fs_gandel75

fs_gandel75
  • Guests

Posted 29 July 2010 - 17:52

y not? because even with current range a gvger of lvl 100 has a huge advantage over a lvl 75.... if it become 50... then gvg will be exploited.....

#6 volcom

volcom

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 236 posts
  • Badge

Posted 29 July 2010 - 17:53

y not? because even with current range a gvger of lvl 100 has a huge advantage over a lvl 75.... if it become 50... then gvg will be exploited.....

im not saying that range should be 50 i said 35

#7 fs_gandel75

fs_gandel75
  • Guests

Posted 29 July 2010 - 17:55

its the same thing

#8 Kayesha

Kayesha

    Veteran

  • New Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,030 posts
  • United States of America

Posted 29 July 2010 - 17:56

It's the same theory. You already have a wide range of targets and the ones at the extremes of those levels are already at a major disadvantage.

#9 fs_gandel75

fs_gandel75
  • Guests

Posted 29 July 2010 - 17:59

It's the same theory. You already have a wide range of targets and the ones at the extremes of those levels are already at a major disadvantage.



i agree with Kayesha1.. y increase the disadvantage.. let it stay as it is... or reduce it by 5 lvls

#10 fs_versux

fs_versux
  • Guests

Posted 29 July 2010 - 18:00

i think that the GvG range, is fine of what is now 25+/- is a good range

#11 fs_918273645

fs_918273645
  • Guests

Posted 29 July 2010 - 18:05

no it shuld stay the same bc it will all go then it will not be fun anymore an i want to make it be fun


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

Font:
Arial | Calibri | Lucida Console | Verdana
 
Font Size:
9px | 10px | 11px | 12px | 10pt | 12pt
 
Color: