Congratulations HCS...
#41
Posted 29 January 2011 - 02:45
#42
fs_ogrvity
Posted 29 January 2011 - 02:46
Without quoting HCS they have stated more than once since the changes to the game that this is what they want and have no issues what-so-ever with it. So there is really no other place to discuss it. What I would really like is for Hoof or someone else at HCS to join the conversation and discuss their viewpoints on the current state of the game instead of just locking any topic that argues against it. But I have a feeling that will never happen.If you feel harassed send in a ticket to HCS or something. Explain your dilemma to them, and they'll help you further. Discussing it in the forums is pretty much pointless because we always keep talking about the same crap over and over.
#43
fs_oblivion05
Posted 29 January 2011 - 02:47
Because the ladder would reward them faster. You can choose any multiplier. Multiply it all by 100 if need be.
"faster" is irrelevant in this matter. Profit is relevant. Profit you can get by farming tokens on the board. So to speak. So it's a bad idea in my book.
#44
Posted 29 January 2011 - 02:47
Any option the PvP community gives requires me to dig into my bank account for being the victim of a half dozen 100 stam hits while offline. Again I ask, why donate to a game that caters to the CC bullies??if u can't stand being 100 stammed and loosin EXP an gold use the Opt-Out feature.... Ya it costs fsp but if ur too cheap to pay for a lil delevelment I guess u won't opt out either
The BB is a very small part of my issues with FS and I understand why bounty hunters do not want to take minimum bounties. I don't blame you at all. You don't need to justify that.
Don't nesecerially need to donate to game
#45
Posted 29 January 2011 - 02:48
#46
fs_oblivion05
Posted 29 January 2011 - 02:48
Without quoting HCS they have stated more than once since the changes to the game that this is what they want and have no issues what-so-ever with it. So there is really no other place to discuss it. What I would really like is for Hoof or someone else at HCS to join the conversation and discuss their viewpoints on the current state of the game instead of just locking any topic that argues against it. But I have a feeling that will never happen.
Hoof and the rest of the cows have stated that if you feel harassed, you should send in a ticket and they will help you. Changes in PvP is irrelevant - harassment is a huge issue for HCS.
#47
Posted 29 January 2011 - 02:49
Without quoting HCS they have stated more than once since the changes to the game that this is what they want and have no issues what-so-ever with it. So there is really no other place to discuss it. What I would really like is for Hoof or someone else at HCS to join the conversation and discuss their viewpoints on the current state of the game instead of just locking any topic that argues against it. But I have a feeling that will never happen.If you feel harassed send in a ticket to HCS or something. Explain your dilemma to them, and they'll help you further. Discussing it in the forums is pretty much pointless because we always keep talking about the same crap over and over.
Why dont you have your guild delevel the attacker? or ask for friends to help?
#48
Posted 29 January 2011 - 02:51
#49
Posted 29 January 2011 - 02:53
Not the first time, and won't be the last...but I feel that it needs to be discussed. It used to be that harrassment was frowned upon by HCS, not anymore. It used to be that bio threats were removed by HCS, now they are almost encouraged. I would love for anyone to come up with a viable response for continued 100 stam attacks that doesn't involve me donating to the game for being the victim...Man u talking about thing like its happen first time !!!
Its too old
So if u feel its annoying u can use one of this >
1. Protection
2. Xp lock
3. fight back
all this part of the game isnt it? :|
...no wonder HCS doesn't care about those that do not want any part of PvP.
1. Protection...means donating to HCS.
2. Xp lock...means donating to HCS.
3. fight back...means donating to indirectly to HCS.
(you forgot about the only other choice)
4. Take it...take it again, and again, and again...
so you want an option given to you for free to stop people pvping in game, whereas the soultions you listed above are a positive outcome for the cows.
I am kinda at a loss why some red text on screen hurts you so much. you already have more max stam than is required to keep up with EOC, and in fact by taking XP from you, it allows you to contribute more XP to your guild which would in turn help keep it in the top 10 a bit longer.
I actually figure these threads are more made out of boredom of not having something to spend your stam on due to your gameplay simply following the EOC road to nowhere. The same things are told to you each time, it's _your_ choice whether you choose to use them or not.
#50
fs_ogrvity
Posted 29 January 2011 - 02:56
Again, without quoting a ticket...It's not an issue for them anymore.
Without quoting HCS they have stated more than once since the changes to the game that this is what they want and have no issues what-so-ever with it. So there is really no other place to discuss it. What I would really like is for Hoof or someone else at HCS to join the conversation and discuss their viewpoints on the current state of the game instead of just locking any topic that argues against it. But I have a feeling that will never happen.
Hoof and the rest of the cows have stated that if you feel harassed, you should send in a ticket and they will help you. Changes in PvP is irrelevant - harassment is a huge issue for HCS.
#51
Posted 29 January 2011 - 02:56
#52
fs_oblivion05
Posted 29 January 2011 - 02:59
Again, without quoting a ticket...It's not an issue for them anymore.
Heh - in a way that's good to know.
#53
Posted 29 January 2011 - 03:01
#54
fs_oblivion05
Posted 29 January 2011 - 03:03
seriously? come on man.....guy doesnt have 4 pvp guilds in his corner to back him up
You don't need a PvP guild to back your friends up... My guild ain't a PvP guild either. In fact, I am the only one actively PvPing. But they back me up always.
#55
Posted 29 January 2011 - 03:05
#56
fs_ogrvity
Posted 29 January 2011 - 03:06
I am kinda at a loss why some red text on screen hurts you so much. you already have more max stam than is required to keep up with EOC, and in fact by taking XP from you, it allows you to contribute more XP to your guild which would in turn help keep it in the top 10 a bit longer.
This is why I don't donate and lock my xp, but I do not agree with the harrassment of 100 stam hits with no possible gain by the attacker.
It's not boredom, but the complete change in policies by HCS for anything relating to PvP and how they have turned their backs on those that do not wish to partake in PvP to hopefully put more coin in their pockets.I actually figure these threads are more made out of boredom of not having something to spend your stam on due to your gameplay simply following the EOC road to nowhere. The same things are told to you each time, it's _your_ choice whether you choose to use them or not.
#57
fs_oblivion05
Posted 29 January 2011 - 03:09
believe it or not alot do...and i didnt say u did....ive seen many need help against non pvp guilds when they are big pvp guilds i have a good laugh when i see the reinforcements and know why people dont wanna b bothered
They don't need a PvP guild to back them up, trust me. Some people just value their own XP more than helping a friend out. "Friends" in pure leveling guilds are just too afraid of XP loss to back their fellow guildmate up.
#58
fs_ogrvity
Posted 29 January 2011 - 03:11
Because the player that was hit placed a bounty on the attacker. Has been 100 stam attacks ever since...im at a loss as to why someone would hit a person that doesnt pvp hourly unless he did something to the guy...theres no challenge there and if not for gold why? for xp? hit a pvper that defends himself...this is type thing gives pvp a bad name
#59
Posted 29 January 2011 - 03:14
#60
fs_oblivion05
Posted 29 January 2011 - 03:18
some do ive seen it and xperianced it...1 on 1 guild fight great but 2 3 or 4 guild on 1 not so impressive...so the OP is not from pvp guild or pvper that im aware of and i have no idea who hes up against thus id recommend dont hit back...
I guess you are right - but, I think this is a one-on-one from what I've read so far. Not 4 guilds against 1.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

This topic is locked