Jump to content

Photo

PvP Ladder lvl range


  • Please log in to reply
32 replies to this topic

Poll: Do you like it? (33 member(s) have cast votes)

Do you like it?

  1. Voted Yes (14 votes [42.42%])

    Percentage of vote: 42.42%

  2. Voted No (19 votes [57.58%])

    Percentage of vote: 57.58%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Tarnos

Tarnos

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 243 posts
  • Poland

Posted 06 February 2011 - 19:34

Hi i have and suggestion about PvP ladder levels range...Why not make it 25 levels? instead of 50? dont you think this would be alot better? right now i see about 3-5 peoples with much more rating...if we make it 25 levels range then more peoples will have chance to win :) so more will do pvp...What do you think?

25-49
50-74
75-99 etc. :)

#2 Ptrgriffin

Ptrgriffin

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,309 posts
  • Canada

Posted 06 February 2011 - 19:37

I personally like this idea, however I think many people will be opposed to it because your trying to encourage more pvp

ptrgriffinsigcopy.png


#3 fs_oblivion05

fs_oblivion05
  • Guests

Posted 06 February 2011 - 19:37

The ladder is fine as is - the only fix you would want to make is to remove the rewards.

#4 Ptrgriffin

Ptrgriffin

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,309 posts
  • Canada

Posted 06 February 2011 - 19:39

The ladder is fine as is - the only fix you would want to make is to remove the rewards.



Hcs said they won't get rid of them, soo we have to make do with what we have

ptrgriffinsigcopy.png


#5 fs_oblivion05

fs_oblivion05
  • Guests

Posted 06 February 2011 - 19:40

Hcs said they won't get rid of them, soo we have to make do with what we have


HCS says a lot yet they always seem to turn their back on their own word.

#6 KitiaraLi

KitiaraLi

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,240 posts
  • Denmark

Posted 06 February 2011 - 19:41

The ladder is fine as is - the only fix you would want to make is to remove the rewards.


and add xp + gold loss for all hits on the ladder :)

No one can deny that we changed this game and influenced it in such a way that NO ONE could compete with us.. so much so that they changed the rules. ~Abhorrence, chosen founder of Cerulean Sins


#7 fs_oblivion05

fs_oblivion05
  • Guests

Posted 06 February 2011 - 19:43

and add xp + gold loss for all hits on the ladder :)


+1

Not quite sure why they won't do that.

#8 Ptrgriffin

Ptrgriffin

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,309 posts
  • Canada

Posted 06 February 2011 - 19:43

The ladder is fine as is - the only fix you would want to make is to remove the rewards.


and add xp + gold loss for all hits on the ladder :)



Levelers wouldnt like... But perhaps if it was every 25levels it would be better

ptrgriffinsigcopy.png


#9 Anemie

Anemie

    Veteran

  • New Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 633 posts

Posted 06 February 2011 - 19:44

The ladder is good as it is-as sad before-only thing that is missing is XP and gold loss for everyone...
And yes,the rewards should stay. :)

#10 Ptrgriffin

Ptrgriffin

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,309 posts
  • Canada

Posted 06 February 2011 - 19:45

The ladder is good as it is-as sad before-only thing that is missing is XP and gold loss for everyone...
And yes,the rewards should stay. :)



Should not :D

ptrgriffinsigcopy.png


#11 fs_oblivion05

fs_oblivion05
  • Guests

Posted 06 February 2011 - 19:46

Levelers wouldnt like... But perhaps if it was every 25levels it would be better


In a real sense, probably worse. The smaller the level range, the more "levelers" get hit.

And yes,the rewards should stay. :)


They should not - rewards drive people crazy beyond belief.

#12 fs_varim64

fs_varim64
  • Guests

Posted 06 February 2011 - 20:11

I think that it should be 25 lvls, but i think it should be that the same persons can't be in the top three more than twice in every 5 resets. plus, i think there should be a 5-24 ladder.

#13 Ptrgriffin

Ptrgriffin

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,309 posts
  • Canada

Posted 06 February 2011 - 20:13

I think that it should be 25 lvls, but i think it should be that the same persons can't be in the top three more than twice in every 5 resets. plus, i think there should be a 5-24 ladder.




I see a bit of phail from this

ptrgriffinsigcopy.png


#14 Tarnos

Tarnos

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 243 posts
  • Poland

Posted 06 February 2011 - 20:14

I think that it should be 25 lvls, but i think it should be that the same persons can't be in the top three more than twice in every 5 resets. plus, i think there should be a 5-24 ladder.


I dont like this ...5-24 no...1-24 are not allowed to prevent players creating multi account and goind for ladder...its bad also same person cant be top 3? its bad too..but if that would be applied in game then i would vote for every 1 reset...that means i cant be top 3 or just i cant do pvp in next ladder after my last win...

#15 LLAP

LLAP

    Veteran

  • New Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,319 posts

Posted 06 February 2011 - 21:05

25-49
50-99 etc. :)

I don't see how 50-99 is the specified range differance your suggesting


#16 fs_penfold83

fs_penfold83
  • Guests

Posted 06 February 2011 - 21:09

what is the point of this whine ? just lvl up to the top of your pvp band then you too can have the same equipment as the ones that is beating you, if not learn how to beat them stats. Only thing that needs to change like sooo many peeps have said before is add xp and gold loss on the ladder.

#17 Tarnos

Tarnos

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 243 posts
  • Poland

Posted 06 February 2011 - 22:34


25-49
50-99 etc. :)

I don't see how 50-99 is the specified range differance your suggesting



ohh soorry for that :D i mean

25-49
50-74
75-99 etc :)

#18 fs_scrogger

fs_scrogger
  • Guests

Posted 06 February 2011 - 22:37

Absolutely NO! We already see and here many people complaining about being targeted as many are farmed for rating. Making smaller bands would put the target even larger on the backs of players as the available list to be hit would be even smaller. It would seem that you simply can't compete at the level your at and want an easy win handed to you. Level up to be more competitive, problem solved.

#19 fs_penfold83

fs_penfold83
  • Guests

Posted 06 February 2011 - 22:41

Absolutely NO! We already see and here many people complaining about being targeted as many are farmed for rating. Making smaller bands would put the target even larger on the backs of players as the available list to be hit would be even smaller. It would seem that you simply can't compete at the level your at and want an easy win handed to you. Level up to be more competitive, problem solved.


+1

#20 Maehdros

Maehdros

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,329 posts
  • Canada

Posted 06 February 2011 - 22:48

Absolutely NO! We already see and here many people complaining about being targeted as many are farmed for rating. Making smaller bands would put the target even larger on the backs of players as the available list to be hit would be even smaller. It would seem that you simply can't compete at the level your at and want an easy win handed to you. Level up to be more competitive, problem solved.



We dont need smaller brackets...drop down a bracket and have some fun if you're bored ;)


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

Font:
Arial | Calibri | Lucida Console | Verdana
 
Font Size:
9px | 10px | 11px | 12px | 10pt | 12pt
 
Color: