25-49
50-74
75-99 etc.
Posted 06 February 2011 - 19:34
Posted 06 February 2011 - 19:37
Posted 06 February 2011 - 19:37
Posted 06 February 2011 - 19:39
The ladder is fine as is - the only fix you would want to make is to remove the rewards.
Posted 06 February 2011 - 19:40
Hcs said they won't get rid of them, soo we have to make do with what we have
Posted 06 February 2011 - 19:41
The ladder is fine as is - the only fix you would want to make is to remove the rewards.
No one can deny that we changed this game and influenced it in such a way that NO ONE could compete with us.. so much so that they changed the rules. ~Abhorrence, chosen founder of Cerulean Sins
Posted 06 February 2011 - 19:43
and add xp + gold loss for all hits on the ladder
Posted 06 February 2011 - 19:43
The ladder is fine as is - the only fix you would want to make is to remove the rewards.
and add xp + gold loss for all hits on the ladder
Posted 06 February 2011 - 19:44
Posted 06 February 2011 - 19:45
The ladder is good as it is-as sad before-only thing that is missing is XP and gold loss for everyone...
And yes,the rewards should stay.
Posted 06 February 2011 - 19:46
Levelers wouldnt like... But perhaps if it was every 25levels it would be better
And yes,the rewards should stay.
Posted 06 February 2011 - 20:11
Posted 06 February 2011 - 20:13
I think that it should be 25 lvls, but i think it should be that the same persons can't be in the top three more than twice in every 5 resets. plus, i think there should be a 5-24 ladder.
Posted 06 February 2011 - 20:14
I think that it should be 25 lvls, but i think it should be that the same persons can't be in the top three more than twice in every 5 resets. plus, i think there should be a 5-24 ladder.
Posted 06 February 2011 - 21:05
I don't see how 50-99 is the specified range differance your suggesting25-49
50-99 etc.
Posted 06 February 2011 - 21:09
Posted 06 February 2011 - 22:34
I don't see how 50-99 is the specified range differance your suggesting
25-49
50-99 etc.
Posted 06 February 2011 - 22:37
Posted 06 February 2011 - 22:41
Absolutely NO! We already see and here many people complaining about being targeted as many are farmed for rating. Making smaller bands would put the target even larger on the backs of players as the available list to be hit would be even smaller. It would seem that you simply can't compete at the level your at and want an easy win handed to you. Level up to be more competitive, problem solved.
Posted 06 February 2011 - 22:48
Absolutely NO! We already see and here many people complaining about being targeted as many are farmed for rating. Making smaller bands would put the target even larger on the backs of players as the available list to be hit would be even smaller. It would seem that you simply can't compete at the level your at and want an easy win handed to you. Level up to be more competitive, problem solved.
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users