Apologies if it's been addressed before
#1
Posted 15 August 2012 - 16:27
Regarding PvP... Why can't their be an option to bounty, ignore or have the option of a retaliatory hit. The retaliatory hit would not be bountyable. This way a player can choose to use the retaliatory hit or bounty... But bit both
Cons
Yes, it might hurt the livelihood of the BB
Pros
I can only speak for myself but I'd rather hit back than place a bounty. But don't want to open myself York being on the BB. I think that if a player could retaliate to a pvp hit without being subsequently placed in the BB it would encourage more people to hit back. Maybe once they do this a few times they will find they like pvp and the community has a new pvper
There have been details discussed in the past I apologize for not infusing them here but I'm on a phone and searching past threads is a burden
Please leave comments suggested details and your own pro cons
I'd especially like to hear from the cows
#2
Posted 15 August 2012 - 16:34
Deflect does a pretty good job already, 43.75% chance to stop incoming attacks, at level 175.
#3
Posted 15 August 2012 - 17:33
No, all hits should be bountiable. I would also like to see the pvp smasher medal returned to its former glory and removal of pvp protection.
Deflect does a pretty good job already, 43.75% chance to stop incoming attacks, at level 175.
Smasher medal has nothing to do with this thread I'd appreciate if it can stay on topic. If you allow for a retaliation hit that can't be bountied you would get more people involved in pvp.
If in 1 day, 100 people used the retaliation hit option, maybe just maybe 1 (or more) of them like the taste of it and give pvp a try.
It would expose more people to an aspect of this game that people are trying to save
#4
Posted 15 August 2012 - 18:50
I think it sounds fair to give the one who got attacked (Person A) a chance to retaliate against the attack (of PersonRegarding PvP... Why can't their be an option to bounty, ignore or have the option of a retaliatory hit. The retaliatory hit would not be bountyable.
Cons
Yes, it might hurt the livelihood of the BB
Pros
I can only speak for myself but I'd rather hit back than place a bounty. But don't want to open myself York being on the BB. I think that if a player could retaliate to a pvp hit without being subsequently placed in the BB it would encourage more people to hit back. Maybe once they do this a few times they will find they like pvp and the community has a new pvper
But I think it would be most fair that if the retaliation hit cannot be bountied then the first attack should also not be bountyable as well if Person A chooses to retaliate. So there can't be both a retaliation hit (Person A hits back Person
So Person A (who got attacked) has 3 options:
[*:1z9k65g3]Bounty the hit (and after that everything returns to normal)
[*:1z9k65g3]Ignore the hit (and everything returns to normal - except Person B 'fears' what Person A will do for two days)
[*:1z9k65g3]Retaliate (and after that everything returns to normal because this option leaves both attacks unbountyable)
Gathering Crystal Cutting 49 | Farming 49 | Fishing 49 | Foraging 49 | Forestry 49 | Prospecting 49 | Skinning 49
Crafting Alchemy 49 | Armorsmithing 49 | Cooking 49 | Jewelry 49 | Leatherworking 49 | Tailoring 49 | Weaponsmithing 49
First person to have maxed them ![]()
Characters (all level 49)
Prophet Savanc Savavita Savavimala Mage Savanhildur Savashengli Savahathor
Warrior Savy Savanikomachos Savafionnchadh Assassin Savalina Savajahangir
Ranger Savakainda Savatakoda Savaraxka Templar Savastanislav Savasegolene
#5
Posted 15 August 2012 - 19:11
I think it sounds fair to give the one who got attacked (Person A) a chance to retaliate against the attack (of PersonRegarding PvP... Why can't their be an option to bounty, ignore or have the option of a retaliatory hit. The retaliatory hit would not be bountyable.
Cons
Yes, it might hurt the livelihood of the BB
Pros
I can only speak for myself but I'd rather hit back than place a bounty. But don't want to open myself York being on the BB. I think that if a player could retaliate to a pvp hit without being subsequently placed in the BB it would encourage more people to hit back. Maybe once they do this a few times they will find they like pvp and the community has a new pvperwithout the chance to get bountied for that retaliation hit (as long as the amounts of stam of both hits are the same).
But I think it would be most fair that if the retaliation hit cannot be bountied then the first attack should also not be bountyable as well if Person A chooses to retaliate. So there can't be both a retaliation hit (Person A hits back Personand a bounty (Person A puts Person B on the BB) for the first attack.
So Person A (who got attacked) has 3 options:
[*:2sjw92oe]Bounty the hit (and after that everything returns to normal)
[*:2sjw92oe]Ignore the hit (and everything returns to normal - except Person B 'fears' what Person A will do for two days)
[*:2sjw92oe]Retaliate (and after that everything returns to normal because this option leaves both attacks unbountyable)
Sorry if I was not clear I meant to indicate that it was a choice either bounty or retaliate but not both
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

