but the idea of the tokens is to INCREASE arena participation is it not? If that is the idea of the tokens, then awarding the same people with tokens that are winning in the arena now would be counter productive if you ask me. If the winner and runner up are the only ones to win tokens then you might as well keep the arena as it is now. Adding token awards for each round would increase the number of people trying to get them. Which i am sure was the original purpose for the idea of the tokens in the first place.
I think the original idea of the tokens was to award the runner up in the finals, as this was a point where some players gave up playing.
But if you wanted to award everyone, then you could apply the following:
First round winner: 1
Second round or 4-man tourney finals: winner 2, runner up 1
Third round or 8-man tourney finals: winner 4, runner up 2
16-man tourney finals: winner 8, runner up 4
Alternatively, keep things as they are. But take out random wins by judges decision. And deflect isn't a fair move, as it thwarts the better setup most of the time.

This topic is locked
