If it becomes an issue, there could be a restriction on how many tokens, if any, could be awarded based on your wins/medal ranking (ie, a silver medal player could only win 5 tokens for losing in final, gold only 2, and crystal medal and up 0....this is just an example)...or you could simply make it to where after 1 player wins the 10 tokens for losing in final round, they have a 'cooldown' period of say 5-10 tourneys before they are eligible to win the tokens as final round loser again (similar to the titan cooldown period after a guild has won the epic outright). This would prevent token abuse from the 'arena masters' and yet still allow the arena 'noobs' and 'learners' to still get their tokens.
So let me ask, if a cooldown period for high-ranking arena players (ie, silver medal and up) were applied to tokens, would this be acceptable?
A cool-down would never fly - all it would accomplish is that they'd stop playing until their cool down had expired again. Hang on a moment - yes, that COULD work
- would they agree to it tho ? - never in a month of sundays LOL.
As for your gladiator example and 'real pvp', it's a joke....real gladiators only lost once...ever
Not actually true
- if there was a very good gladiatorial bout and one person was disabled, the victor would ask the emporer for a thumbs up / thumbs down. If he was impressed by the way the losing gladiator fought, he could give the thumbs up and grant mercy ![]()

This topic is locked