so whats the supreme ruby bonus now?
Incoming Patch v1.17b : Tuesday 22nd!
#21
Posted 22 July 2014 - 15:43

#22
Posted 22 July 2014 - 16:07
Game servers are now online.
John Stewart
Chief Operations Officer
#23
Posted 22 July 2014 - 16:19
Fable set still big let down for me I still lose haste not surprized though
#24
Posted 22 July 2014 - 16:25
It says: "Login failed: Account is in maintenance, please wait" for me
Nevermind.
Edited by Xian, 22 July 2014 - 16:27.
#25
Posted 22 July 2014 - 16:32
K so before I go off on a giant post of negativity i'd like to say congratz on buffing the fabled set bonuses,very much needed!
Now for my annoying side to come out and aggravate people...so the post before discussing hyb wep rolls..it was said that the hyb weapon rolls...can reach pure gem status. well this is an bad idea especially now that sup+ just got a nice buff...meaning that rolls can now be increased even further then initially intended if you still plan on having them be able to reach pure. Also! this would mean that when 50 content comes out...rolled items will be reaching flawless status on hyb weapons end...= further devalue gems. anything above 50 content (aka chapter 2)= perfect rolls,so you'll have to again extend the gems in the game,and cause a very big problem with your gem economy in the game due to how expensive it is let alone getting a perfect gem even at a devalued rate. So now you'll have to go back and decrease gems needed per upgrade+ fp needed per fuse.
Characters:
Guthix:
Level 40 Mage.
Chelsea's Man<3
#26
Posted 22 July 2014 - 16:35
It says: "Login failed: Account is in maintenance, please wait" for me
Nevermind.
i get the same, without the Nevermind ![]()
I can tolerate ignorance, but i cannot stand stupidity
the past can't be altered, the future can't be controlled, live for the here and now
#27
Posted 22 July 2014 - 16:37
Eh these gems r joke ;x Rubies r same rest lil boost still too expensive to go more than radiant :c
#28
Posted 22 July 2014 - 16:38
i get the same, without the Nevermind
They are fixing the hybrid "broken" roll one by one, ive just got my hybrid weapon fixed. Good job HCS
#29
Posted 22 July 2014 - 16:38
i get the same, without the Nevermind
Should be resolved now.
#30
Posted 22 July 2014 - 16:41
Should be resolved now.
OK now, thank you ![]()
Edited by Kezza, 22 July 2014 - 16:42.
I can tolerate ignorance, but i cannot stand stupidity
the past can't be altered, the future can't be controlled, live for the here and now
#31
Posted 22 July 2014 - 16:48
supreme = old radiant
radiant = old flawless
pure = old perfect+1* ?
flawless = old perfect+3* ?
perfect = old perfect+5* ?
Not sure if this is applicable for all gems
#32
Posted 22 July 2014 - 16:50
old perfect=65 crit now its 95 crit.
Characters:
Guthix:
Level 40 Mage.
Chelsea's Man<3
#33
Posted 22 July 2014 - 16:52
But rubies r same and overall I would like to see twice buff on fabled ;x I don't like crit on war, preffer more attack power and more hp/vit.
#34
Posted 22 July 2014 - 16:53
So why did rubies not gain the same % compared to attack gems? So rubies will obviously devalue now -.-
And sapphires gained even less than attack power gems, they were already the shittiest X power gems, and they were 20 power stronger than amber/emerald/topaz before.
#35
Posted 22 July 2014 - 16:54
So why did rubies not gain the same % compared to attack gems? So rubies will obviously devalue now -.-
only the supreme- the rest will rocket now that a perfect ruby is 3% more dmg. also the perfect ruby will even with a minimal buff still be better then att/crit for mh weps.
Characters:
Guthix:
Level 40 Mage.
Chelsea's Man<3
#36
Posted 22 July 2014 - 16:55
So why did rubies not gain the same % compared to attack gems? So rubies will obviously devalue now -.-
And sapphires gained even less than attack power gems, they were already the shittiest X power gems, and they were 20 power stronger than amber/emerald/topaz before.
The % based one's did get buffed, just at a higher tier.
John Stewart
Chief Operations Officer
#37
Posted 22 July 2014 - 16:58
that's great, thanks a lot.
#38
Posted 22 July 2014 - 16:59
old perfect=65 crit now its 95 crit.
new perfect crit = old perfect + 5*old crit increment in high tier = 65 +5*6 = 95
Thx, this confirms my post then.
#39
Posted 22 July 2014 - 17:07
Supreme and Radiant rubies r same so unless you plan to craft Pure it's weaker than amber/emerald/topaz ^^
Example:
1x Glimm Ruby - 60ep - 5%
1x Supreme Ruby - 1620ep - 8%
1x Radiant Ruby - 4860ep - 9%
Finally 1x Pure Ruby - 14.580ep - Only 1% more and that price - 11% loled
Ambers/Emeralds/Topazes provide better buff from Supreme and r cheaper it will for sure decrease value of rubies ^^
Edited by Simeonus, 22 July 2014 - 17:08.
#40
Posted 22 July 2014 - 17:08
OLD
Perfect amber on fully buffed warrior -> 700 x 1.58 / 18.35 = 60.27 dps
Perfect ruby on fabled 2 hand -> 613.5 x 0.12 = 73.62 dps
Amber on sin/war -> 700 x 1.67 / 18.35 = 63.70 dps
Ruby on sin/war -> 306.6 x 0.12 = 36.79 dps
Amber on templar -> 700 x 1.38 / 18.35 = 52.64 dps
Ruby on templar -> 306.6 x 0.12 = 36.79 dps
Emerald on ranger -> 700 x 1.44 / 18.35 = 54.93 dps
Ruby on ranger -> 460 x 0.12 = 55.2 dps
Topaz on mage/pure dps prophet -> 700 x 1.35 / 18.35 = 51.49 dps
Ruby on mage/pure dps prophet -> 460 x 0.12 = 55.2 dps
NEW
Perfect amber on fully buffed warrior -> 995 x 1.58 / 18.35 = 85.67 dps
Perfect ruby on fabled 2 hand -> 613.5 x 0.15 = 92.03 (still better)
Amber on sin/war -> 995 x 1.67 / 18.35 = 90.55 (still better)
Ruby on sin/war -> 306.6 x 0.15 = 45.99
Amber on templar -> 995 x 1.38 / 18.35 = 74.82 dps (still better)
Ruby on templar -> 306.6 x 0.15 = 45.99 dps
Emerald on ranger -> 995 x 1.44 / 18.35 = 78.08 dps (NEW better)
Ruby on ranger -> 460 x 0.15 = 69 dps
Topaz on mage/pure dps prophet -> 995 x 1.35 / 18.35 = 73.20 dps (NEW better)
Ruby on mage/pure dps prophet -> 460 x 0.15 = 69 dps
Edited by Alteration, 22 July 2014 - 17:11.

