Jump to content

Photo

POLL


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

Poll: VOTING (59 member(s) have cast votes)

are you against removing buff restriction?

  1. NO (40 votes [67.80%])

    Percentage of vote: 67.80%

  2. yes (19 votes [32.20%])

    Percentage of vote: 32.20%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 kitobas

kitobas

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 492 posts

Posted 09 May 2015 - 18:25

I making this short:

 

there is buff restriction of max 25 players buffing in 1 window, if you buffing 26 or more players then it not working :(

 

removing buff restriction is good for GVG and RELICS for guilds who having 25+ members in guild, you can then buff very fast and save time :)

 

please NO COMMENTS or POSTS

 

please only give your VOTE in POLL

 

thank you for your time to giving VOTE

 

please NO COMMENTS or POSTS



#2 RebornJedi

RebornJedi

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5,449 posts

Posted 09 May 2015 - 19:15

All I want to do is comment and refuse to vote.. REBELS!

844868.gif

 


#3 Jonathan69

Jonathan69

    New Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 45 posts

Posted 09 May 2015 - 20:41

should be abel to buff more than 25 , if not why be abel to have more than 25 members ! you should be abel to bull all active members !



#4 RebornJedi

RebornJedi

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5,449 posts

Posted 09 May 2015 - 22:27

Star-Wars-Force-Awakens-X-Wing-Trailer.g

I'm not against removing the restriction but its probably there for a reason.. Could be a code issue or fear of spam.. It used to be only 16 players and any more would stop any buff from being cast.. I imagine that now with 26 players it would not cast on anyone? ..

What would be the next restriction because I think it would be a bit excessive to be able to add 1000+ players at once.. Or is thus suggestion not up for debate ;)

 


#5 yghorbeviahn

yghorbeviahn

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,652 posts

Posted 10 May 2015 - 00:11

What about anything over 50 BUFFS CASTED at once requires a confirmation pop-up window?



#6 Removed18058

Removed18058

    Veteran

  • New Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,401 posts
  • Badge

Posted 10 May 2015 - 01:08

the more buffs at once the more you demand from the server  so this limit is probably there for a reason


Fastest asv healer
Fastest rg healer

fastest icc healer in progress

Gotta go fast :P


#7 cyrus7

cyrus7

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,562 posts
  • Badge
  • United States of America

Posted 10 May 2015 - 04:14

please NO COMMENTS or POSTS

 

please only give your VOTE in POLL

 

thank you for your time to giving VOTE

 

please NO COMMENTS or POSTS

LMAO. It's a forum. Here's a post.  :D

 

Oh, and here's a comment. It's fine as it is. This suggested change is simply due to people being too lazy to do more than one buff group.

 

Personally, I don't think guilds should even be permitted to have more than 25 players in it, and that would solve your problem of too many players to buff at once, but that's an entirely different thread.



#8 EpicPiety

EpicPiety

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,460 posts

Posted 10 May 2015 - 10:24

Hope this has nothing to do with the *Cough* Exploit *Cough*



#9 bjkills

bjkills

    New Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 48 posts

Posted 10 May 2015 - 23:43

^^^

Professional Arena Player when it comes to losing. Avid Titan Hunter. Sometimes I buy and sell stuff.


#10 kitobas

kitobas

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 492 posts

Posted 18 May 2015 - 22:49

B)



#11 Egami

Egami

    Veteran

  • New Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,863 posts

Posted 18 May 2015 - 23:57

I'm wondering if the poll question itself is confusing. I don't think it was meant to be phrased that way.

 

Currently, the "No"s are saying they aren't against the buff restriction, but are not suggesting they are for it. 

 

The "Yes"s are stating that they ARE against the removal of said restriction.

 

I didn't vote because of that.

 

Regardless, I'm not really sure how necessary this is. 

 

However, I never saw a reason for a limit though.

 

Personally, I'd also like to see a Buff Guild option (no limit).

 

Perhaps a Buff AG (or all AGs) option, along with a Buff Relic (s) Defense option. 

 

Hope that's not off-topic. Just a seed coming from the idea. 

 

Prosperous smacking everybody! (o0



#12 gilby90813

gilby90813

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 434 posts

Posted 19 May 2015 - 08:38

yeah wording is confusing i had to look at results to understand what it was really saying



#13 Olef

Olef

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 71 posts

Posted 29 May 2015 - 15:08

bump



#14 Kedyn

Kedyn

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 698 posts
  • Badge
  • United States of America

Posted 29 May 2015 - 17:47

I voted yes. 25 members is really a large number of people to buff, and should be good enough. 

 

In GVG, you're not going to buff every single member in the guild, if there is only 1-2 people being targeted are you? 

 

Also, You wouldn't buff 29 members of your guild whenever only 3 people are on defending a relic, would you? 

 

25 is more than enough. 


Edited by Kedyn, 29 May 2015 - 17:47.


#15 Tlingit

Tlingit

    New Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 27 posts

Posted 29 May 2015 - 21:35

To many of anything slows down the movement of the whole.  In this case the bigger the data package you send, the longer it takes and the slower it goes.  Lag sucks.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Font:
Arial | Calibri | Lucida Console | Verdana
 
Font Size:
9px | 10px | 11px | 12px | 10pt | 12pt
 
Color: