Jump to content

Lahona

Member Since 15 Apr 2013
Offline Last Active Feb 13 2019 18:33

#816047 Next Roadmap - VOTE NOW!

Posted by Egami on 12 October 2013 - 18:27

A personal FSP bank is just that, PERSONAL.

 

Being able to withdraw from a guild FSP bank is not personal. The person with the permission (if it were ever granted) may well have not contributed ANY fsp ...

 

Historically, fsp withdrawals from the guild kitty have always been denied as a measure of "safety" for the guild fortunes - I personally see no reason to change it.

 

If guilds need fsp's for new gear, or to pay for gvg'rs, or whatever, then the founder can just ask for donations from members directly, rather than into the upgrade "bank".

Pardoux... just more "brain (or lack of) storming"... I recently did exactly what you mentioned for some forging.

 

This is definitely not something I would prioritize. However, what would you think about the possibility of two Guild FSP banks?

 

The idea is one that is protected with no withdrawal capabilities and one that has a withdrawal option (GF restricted or permission-based)? Think that "might" be interesting and take care of the "work"...

 

Again, definitely not a priority and if there is some discussion out there... would love a link to get more info.

 

Thanks.




#815945 Titan Cool Down

Posted by Pardoux on 11 October 2013 - 21:09

There are currently 13 titans on cool down. Some for weeks. I think this could be improved. Anybody agree?

 

How ?

 

The TKP required for an item could be lowered ? - this would, I suspect, encourage more folk to clean them up ? At the moment, the higher end titans are all around the 4 x "secure kill" if memory serves me right ? - I did a thread about standardising it some time ago but can't find it. Maybe lowering that to 3 x "secure kill" or even 2.5 x ??

 

The other option that was mentioned sometime ago was a "finish it or lose it" suggestion - that after 2 weeks of being secured but not killed, the securing guild was sent a message saying something akin to "your secure is at risk - finish the titan off or lose your item" and they had a further week to do so. Failure meant the titan respawned at full strength some time in the future and the previous secured item was lost.

 

What suggestions d'ya have ? :)




#815783 Next Roadmap - VOTE NOW!

Posted by koenvdv on 10 October 2013 - 12:26

How about a rework of the top rated section? Instead of that u need to klick on each list to see your position, you could show all your positions and show the full list when u click on that. Like this for example:

ranking_zps600bac74.png




#815737 Next Roadmap - VOTE NOW!

Posted by Hoofmaster on 09 October 2013 - 23:30

Everything is fine with the Improve Composing idea. But I'm disagree with this one "Randomize the default potion bottle/potion color when creating a new potion." I Think it should be kept as it is now. Let the player choose the colour/ bottle for their own. Thanks :)

 

We'll make it a preference so you can choose whether you want it randomised or not :)




#815755 GvG and New Players.

Posted by MummRa on 10 October 2013 - 01:42

I definetly think there should be some kind of protection, but the protection I would be looking for hasn't been mentioned.  What if you can only particpate in GvG (ie attack or be a target) if you at least have a Bronze Guild Loyalty Medal.  I know there are "professional GvGers" and "travelers" who may not like this idea.  But anything that has an effect on the guild, I feel should be tied to loyal members.  It only takes 30 days to get the Bronze Medal become a part of a guild before you participate in GvG




#815630 Next Roadmap - VOTE NOW!

Posted by mogulic on 09 October 2013 - 07:41

Looking at times needed to implement these developments can't help myself thinking how many of 1 day or shorter developments could be implemented while this poll lasts...

 

It is obvious that 1-2 weeks developments will win in the poll so we'll have to wait a year or so for some developments that would take few hours to be implemented (not saying that I'm interested in any of those, just that it's a nonsense...)

 

Why not split developments into two groups based on a time needed to implement them - let's say one group with a day or less time needed to implement and other with more than a day. Then, implement one development from the long group and one from the short one, and again and again, in order set by the poll, of course...




#815615 Next Roadmap - VOTE NOW!

Posted by milon9999 on 09 October 2013 - 03:39

Improve Composing

  • Randomize the default potion bottle/potion color when creating a new potion.
  • Add templates for Composing potions so you can quickly create them again.
  • Add the ability to create multiple potions simultaneously (the amount you could create at the same time would be determined by your Composing level)
  • Add a medal for the number of potions created (note this would not be retroactive).
  • Add a log notification when potions are complete (and a new preference to turn this off)
Estimated Time to Add: 2 weeks
 
 

Everything is fine with the Improve Composing idea. But I'm disagree with this one "Randomize the default potion bottle/potion color when creating a new potion." I Think it should be kept as it is now. Let the player choose the colour/ bottle for their own. Thanks :)




#815590 Next Roadmap - VOTE NOW!

Posted by Tastria on 08 October 2013 - 23:49

 

Improve the Attack Player interface
This would include showing active players within your range and their gold in-hand.
 
Estimated Time to Add: 3 days

might as well add a top rated for most gold stolen just a suggestion haha

 

While I can see why the pvp addicts would like this, it's more than a trifle unfair.  Anyway, you can go to find player and find everyone who's on in your range.  Letting them know how much gold you're carrying takes away any incentive to stalk targets, and makes it much too easy to attack someone during or right after a hunt.

     It's been said many times that this is a pvp game. I'd hate to see it get turned into a primarily pvp game.




#815522 Next Roadmap - VOTE NOW!

Posted by Hoofmaster on 08 October 2013 - 16:38

I may have OCD but i like say for eg clicking left three times to select pot shape then right 5 times to select colour, knowing where the parts i want at the time are, things are gonna change every composing level, everytime a guild wants a different pot and everytime i want to make a batch and im not a fan of templates to begin with so unless there is virtually limitless that is only gonna be semi-useful anyway, easier to just have a randomize button for those that dont like to know where they are ;)

 

We could make it a preference if you'd like the potions design/color randomised or not :)




#815513 Next Roadmap - VOTE NOW!

Posted by Melissa3 on 08 October 2013 - 16:21

'A free pass'? Not quite. They are on the PvP Ladder. The ONLY way to get such points is through hitting each other. They have DELIBERATELY opened themselves to PvP. That's not a free pass.
 

If they are not active, they should not count. Simple as that I'm afraid.

Why do they not count?  Does history not matter? They put work into the game and may return and earned their place.  So in my opinion they do count.




#815507 Next Roadmap - VOTE NOW!

Posted by Melissa3 on 08 October 2013 - 16:07

Improve Top Rated

Hide inactive players from all the top rated pages.

 

 

I totally disagree with this change.    Players have earned the right to make that top list.   We have ample opportunity to pass them on that list by working our way up the list.  We have no right to take them off that list merely because thy have become inactive.  Players should work their way up the list and if we work hard enough we will earn our place on that list just as the inactive has earned their place to be there !




#815483 Next Roadmap - VOTE NOW!

Posted by Doginal on 08 October 2013 - 14:45

My main is improved Composing as it is short and sweet. With that PLEASE DO NOT randomize potion colour and bottle type. Different potions I make as different colours and shapes. I would rather know that i need to click left 4 times to get to my bottle, then have to go searching for it every time.




#815374 Next Roadmap...

Posted by Aboalarab on 07 October 2013 - 21:15

there is another thing u might be able to add, its cool i think most players would like it . its when we buy an item in AH along with the message

 

" You have won the action for the item Pharaohs Scarab Linen. this item will now available for the nest 24 hours in yout item mailbox "

 

u can add an extra , saying how much it costed you like "  You have won the action for the item Pharaohs Scarab Linen.,,,,,,,( WICH COST YOU 10 FSPs ) ,,,,,this item will now available for the nest 24 hours in yout item mailbox "

 

that would be great , thanks :D




#815322 Next Roadmap...

Posted by spyders on 07 October 2013 - 14:51

can we see what a creature drops when we hunt it on mapps? ...

when you click on  View Creatures




#815307 Next Roadmap...

Posted by thering66 on 07 October 2013 - 12:31

how about adding a small note in the ignore list? i can't remember why i put some people ignore list






Font:
Arial | Calibri | Lucida Console | Verdana
 
Font Size:
9px | 10px | 11px | 12px | 10pt | 12pt
 
Color: