Jump to content

Photo

Legendary Event. Dragon Attack 2!


  • Please log in to reply
122 replies to this topic

#61 Spitfire666123

Spitfire666123

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,096 posts
  • Badge

Posted 08 January 2014 - 13:24

Was 1800 the only set changed?

 

Yes.



#62 Subject

Subject

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 575 posts

Posted 08 January 2014 - 13:25

Why would the 1800 he the only set changed... 845 sets pretty useless as well...

#63 Subject

Subject

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 575 posts

Posted 08 January 2014 - 13:29

I think if 1 set is changed because of HP ( and it was a level 1800 complaining ) that other sets like 845 HP based set should be changed as well ... No benefit from HP sets.. But if it stats are decided to stay the same i just will not participate in this event and wait for next one i suppose

#64 Spitfire666123

Spitfire666123

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,096 posts
  • Badge

Posted 08 January 2014 - 13:29

Why would the 1800 he the only set changed... 845 sets pretty useless as well...

 

http://forums.hunted...showtopic=61744

 

I would imagine the answer from this thread works for all sets except for the 1800 one



#65 Spitfire666123

Spitfire666123

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,096 posts
  • Badge

Posted 08 January 2014 - 13:31

I think if 1 set is changed because of HP ( and it was a level 1800 complaining ) that other sets like 845 HP based set should be changed as well ... No benefit from HP sets.. But if it stats are decided to stay the same i just will not participate in this event and wait for next one i suppose

 

That is your choice. Somebody somewhere could possibly find an exclusive use for each and every one of these sets. Just because you can't find one, doesn't mean it's useless to everyone everywhere



#66 Shylark57

Shylark57

    Veteran

  • New Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 802 posts
  • Badge

Posted 08 January 2014 - 13:33

That is your choice. Somebody somewhere could possibly find an exclusive use for each and every one of these sets. Just because you can't find one, doesn't mean it's useless to everyone everywhere

True but also seems sort of one sided to me here....



#67 Subject

Subject

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 575 posts

Posted 08 January 2014 - 13:34

That is your choice. Somebody somewhere could possibly find an exclusive use for each and every one of these sets. Just because you can't find one, doesn't mean it's useless to everyone everywhere




I suppose you may be right... Just dont understand why one set gets to be changed and the rest have to stay as is.. Little one sided if you ask me... But this is my last post... So hope everyone enjoys this event.. Have a great day...

#68 BigGrim

BigGrim

    Content Designer

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPip
  • 9,817 posts
  • Badge

Posted 08 January 2014 - 14:12

No other sets will be changed. People will find uses for the others.

#69 WarQueen

WarQueen

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,185 posts
  • Badge

Posted 08 January 2014 - 14:27

Yeah... the use found for most of them is to fragment them for composing potions...
 


WarQueenSig1_zpsfe2b03d4.png


#70 Uralus

Uralus

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 199 posts

Posted 08 January 2014 - 14:30

With all this HP, perhaps Chi strike will be a more usefull buff now.



#71 Spitfire666123

Spitfire666123

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,096 posts
  • Badge

Posted 08 January 2014 - 14:32

With all this HP, perhaps Chi strike will be a more usefull buff now.

 

Why go Chi Strike when you can just use Armor/Damage, and get more?



#72 BigGrim

BigGrim

    Content Designer

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPip
  • 9,817 posts
  • Badge

Posted 08 January 2014 - 14:41

Why go Chi Strike when you can just use Armor/Damage, and get more?


Because Chi Strike ADDS damage, not transfers, thus you end up with loads of HP AND Damage. I think that has merit.

#73 Uralus

Uralus

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 199 posts

Posted 08 January 2014 - 14:43

I agree there is too much damage in the game making buffs like Chi strike less usefull, but maybe the future will bring sets that can be used differently. The amount of damage gained from Chi Strike is too limited at the moment. I am a long way from the 1800 set, but those EOC players mist a chance to try something different by getting those stats changed. Now they can continued with what they now best and just stack damage. Though the sets with HP are not good enough. They need even more HP.


Edited by Uralus, 08 January 2014 - 14:45.


#74 Spitfire666123

Spitfire666123

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,096 posts
  • Badge

Posted 08 January 2014 - 14:55

Because Chi Strike ADDS damage, not transfers, thus you end up with loads of HP AND Damage. I think that has merit.

but HP is only useful if you have Armor as well, on top of other stats.

 

In other news, I have found a use for Lakota :)

 

Demon Queen, Lakota, Folgoredens, and Lobber with Attack gloves. Might only be because I have my Level up points in Attack, so feel less of the lack of Attack than most would :)



#75 yghorbeviahn

yghorbeviahn

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,654 posts

Posted 08 January 2014 - 15:06

+1 to Create a Chi Strike 300 on Special section...Or something like that.



#76 RebornJedi

RebornJedi

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5,450 posts

Posted 08 January 2014 - 15:13

No other sets will be changed. People will find uses for the others.

could of been said about the level 1800 set..

 

buffs like Chi Strike, Fortitude, Anchored, Ageless, and even the random mix of High Guard/Savagery could of made some uses outta the set.. not to mention, future sets - since this is a level 1800 set there are a LOT of holes to fill with new sets via legendary/crystal/scavenging drops and made with pvp token/arena resources 

 

wonder if a couple hours was enough time to really ask for an adjustment. was under a day enough time to make an adjustment based on 41 votes outta the 200+ players who are of level to wear the set, which some of the votes were from players who weren't of level anyways...

 

i hope stats aren't so easily adjusted after they are introduced into the game in the future..


Edited by RebornJedi, 08 January 2014 - 15:14.

 


#77 cyrus7

cyrus7

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,562 posts
  • Badge
  • United States of America

Posted 08 January 2014 - 15:20

to make an adjustment based on 41 votes outta the 200+ players who are of level to wear the set, which some of the votes were from players who weren't of level anyways...

The same could be said for the "no" votes.



#78 RebornJedi

RebornJedi

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5,450 posts

Posted 08 January 2014 - 15:28

:rolleyes:


 


#79 yghorbeviahn

yghorbeviahn

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,654 posts

Posted 08 January 2014 - 15:46

The point it's not the adjustment itself, we don't have a lot of gear on that range.

+1 To Grim to do this.

And i don't think any other set need any changes, they could be useless, but the game really needs a new damage based setup on lvl 1800 range.



#80 vlkfenrir

vlkfenrir

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 395 posts

Posted 08 January 2014 - 15:49

While we might (not really a big chance) found a use for the set as it was it is in my opinion great that we got some change to hunting gear thanks to the change. To be honest hunting in gear from which the newst items were over 300 lvls lower than the creatures was starting to be a bit frustrating.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

Font:
Arial | Calibri | Lucida Console | Verdana
 
Font Size:
9px | 10px | 11px | 12px | 10pt | 12pt
 
Color: